Non-criteria Antiphospholipid Antibodies: a narrative review
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2020 |
Other Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
Download full: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302020001101595 |
Summary: | SUMMARY The 2006 Revised Sapporo Classification Criteria for Definite Antiphospholipid Syndrome included as laboratory criteria the tests for antiphospholipid antibodies whose accuracy was regarded as satisfactory according to the evidence available at that time. In practice, however, the sensitivity and specificity of these “criteria” of antiphospholipid antibodies are sometimes insufficient for identifying or ruling out antiphospholipid syndrome. It has been studied whether the accuracy of the laboratory diagnosis of the syndrome could be improved by testing for non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies. In this work, we review evidence on the clinical associations and diagnostic value of the most commonly studied non-criteria antibodies, namely: antiphosphatidylethanolamine, anti-annexin A5, anti-prothrombin, anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin complex, IgA anticardiolipin, and IgG anti-domain I of the β2 glycoprotein antibodies. |
id |
AMB-1_ae28a6b079e3cccf86e1bb0bfedb29fc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0104-42302020001101595 |
network_acronym_str |
AMB-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Non-criteria Antiphospholipid Antibodies: a narrative reviewAntiphospholipid syndromeAntibodies, AntiphospholipidThrombosis/diagnosisSUMMARY The 2006 Revised Sapporo Classification Criteria for Definite Antiphospholipid Syndrome included as laboratory criteria the tests for antiphospholipid antibodies whose accuracy was regarded as satisfactory according to the evidence available at that time. In practice, however, the sensitivity and specificity of these “criteria” of antiphospholipid antibodies are sometimes insufficient for identifying or ruling out antiphospholipid syndrome. It has been studied whether the accuracy of the laboratory diagnosis of the syndrome could be improved by testing for non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies. In this work, we review evidence on the clinical associations and diagnostic value of the most commonly studied non-criteria antibodies, namely: antiphosphatidylethanolamine, anti-annexin A5, anti-prothrombin, anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin complex, IgA anticardiolipin, and IgG anti-domain I of the β2 glycoprotein antibodies.Associação Médica Brasileira2020-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302020001101595Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.66 n.11 2020reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)instacron:AMB10.1590/1806-9282.66.11.1595info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFunke,AndreasStaub,Henrique LuizMonticielo,Odirlei AndreBalbi,Gustavo Guimarães MoreiraDanowski,AdrianaSantiago,Mittermayer BarretoAndrade,Danieli Castro Oliveira deRêgo,Jozeliaeng2020-11-30T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-42302020001101595Revistahttps://ramb.amb.org.br/ultimas-edicoes/#https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||ramb@amb.org.br1806-92820104-4230opendoar:2020-11-30T00:00Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Non-criteria Antiphospholipid Antibodies: a narrative review |
title |
Non-criteria Antiphospholipid Antibodies: a narrative review |
spellingShingle |
Non-criteria Antiphospholipid Antibodies: a narrative review Funke,Andreas Antiphospholipid syndrome Antibodies, Antiphospholipid Thrombosis/diagnosis |
title_short |
Non-criteria Antiphospholipid Antibodies: a narrative review |
title_full |
Non-criteria Antiphospholipid Antibodies: a narrative review |
title_fullStr |
Non-criteria Antiphospholipid Antibodies: a narrative review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Non-criteria Antiphospholipid Antibodies: a narrative review |
title_sort |
Non-criteria Antiphospholipid Antibodies: a narrative review |
author |
Funke,Andreas |
author_facet |
Funke,Andreas Staub,Henrique Luiz Monticielo,Odirlei Andre Balbi,Gustavo Guimarães Moreira Danowski,Adriana Santiago,Mittermayer Barreto Andrade,Danieli Castro Oliveira de Rêgo,Jozelia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Staub,Henrique Luiz Monticielo,Odirlei Andre Balbi,Gustavo Guimarães Moreira Danowski,Adriana Santiago,Mittermayer Barreto Andrade,Danieli Castro Oliveira de Rêgo,Jozelia |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Funke,Andreas Staub,Henrique Luiz Monticielo,Odirlei Andre Balbi,Gustavo Guimarães Moreira Danowski,Adriana Santiago,Mittermayer Barreto Andrade,Danieli Castro Oliveira de Rêgo,Jozelia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Antiphospholipid syndrome Antibodies, Antiphospholipid Thrombosis/diagnosis |
topic |
Antiphospholipid syndrome Antibodies, Antiphospholipid Thrombosis/diagnosis |
description |
SUMMARY The 2006 Revised Sapporo Classification Criteria for Definite Antiphospholipid Syndrome included as laboratory criteria the tests for antiphospholipid antibodies whose accuracy was regarded as satisfactory according to the evidence available at that time. In practice, however, the sensitivity and specificity of these “criteria” of antiphospholipid antibodies are sometimes insufficient for identifying or ruling out antiphospholipid syndrome. It has been studied whether the accuracy of the laboratory diagnosis of the syndrome could be improved by testing for non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies. In this work, we review evidence on the clinical associations and diagnostic value of the most commonly studied non-criteria antibodies, namely: antiphosphatidylethanolamine, anti-annexin A5, anti-prothrombin, anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin complex, IgA anticardiolipin, and IgG anti-domain I of the β2 glycoprotein antibodies. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-11-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302020001101595 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302020001101595 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1806-9282.66.11.1595 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Médica Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Médica Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.66 n.11 2020 reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB) instacron:AMB |
instname_str |
Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB) |
instacron_str |
AMB |
institution |
AMB |
reponame_str |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||ramb@amb.org.br |
_version_ |
1754212835583328256 |