Effect of anesthesia type on outcome measures in cesarean section in the presence of fetal macrosomia

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Taşgöz,Fatma Nurgül
Publication Date: 2022
Other Authors: Kılıçarslan,Nermin
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302022001001410
Summary: SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of general and spinal anesthesia on maternal and neonatal outcomes during cesarean section in pregnancies with macrosomia. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 1043 patients who delivered by cesarean section between May 2018 and December 2021 and had a baby born with a birth weight of 4000 g or greater. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared according to the type of anesthesia performed in the spinal anesthesia group (n=903; 86.6%) and general anesthesia group (n=140; 13.4%). The Apgar score was categorized into <7 and ≥7. RESULTS: Neonates with an Apgar score of <7 at the first minute (11.4 vs. 0.4%; p<0.001) and the fifth minute (2.9 vs. 0.3%; p=0.004) were significantly higher in the general anesthesia group. The preoperative and postoperative hematocrit difference was significantly lower in patients who received spinal anesthesia than those who received general anesthesia [2 (1.1–3.1) vs. 4.05 (2.8–5.35); p<0.001]. The number of patients transfused was higher in the general anesthesia group (9.3 vs. 2.7%; p<0.001). In the regression model, general anesthesia, birth weight, and emergency conditions were significant independent factors related to the preoperative and postoperative hematocrit decrease (p<0.001, p=0.005, and p=0.034, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Apgar scores of <7 at the first and fifth minutes are higher in macrosomic neonates who received general anesthesia than in neonates who received spinal anesthesia. Performing cesarean section under general anesthesia in mothers of macrosomic neonates results in a greater decrease in hematocrit value and a greater need for blood transfusion than under spinal anesthesia.
id AMB-1_6fd462c16b7ce67978f8cf28a3d22602
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0104-42302022001001410
network_acronym_str AMB-1
network_name_str Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Effect of anesthesia type on outcome measures in cesarean section in the presence of fetal macrosomiaCesarean sectionFetal macrosomiaGeneral anesthesiaPregnancy outcomesSpinal anesthesiaSUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of general and spinal anesthesia on maternal and neonatal outcomes during cesarean section in pregnancies with macrosomia. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 1043 patients who delivered by cesarean section between May 2018 and December 2021 and had a baby born with a birth weight of 4000 g or greater. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared according to the type of anesthesia performed in the spinal anesthesia group (n=903; 86.6%) and general anesthesia group (n=140; 13.4%). The Apgar score was categorized into <7 and ≥7. RESULTS: Neonates with an Apgar score of <7 at the first minute (11.4 vs. 0.4%; p<0.001) and the fifth minute (2.9 vs. 0.3%; p=0.004) were significantly higher in the general anesthesia group. The preoperative and postoperative hematocrit difference was significantly lower in patients who received spinal anesthesia than those who received general anesthesia [2 (1.1–3.1) vs. 4.05 (2.8–5.35); p<0.001]. The number of patients transfused was higher in the general anesthesia group (9.3 vs. 2.7%; p<0.001). In the regression model, general anesthesia, birth weight, and emergency conditions were significant independent factors related to the preoperative and postoperative hematocrit decrease (p<0.001, p=0.005, and p=0.034, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Apgar scores of <7 at the first and fifth minutes are higher in macrosomic neonates who received general anesthesia than in neonates who received spinal anesthesia. Performing cesarean section under general anesthesia in mothers of macrosomic neonates results in a greater decrease in hematocrit value and a greater need for blood transfusion than under spinal anesthesia.Associação Médica Brasileira2022-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302022001001410Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.68 n.10 2022reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)instacron:AMB10.1590/1806-9282.20220382info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTaşgöz,Fatma NurgülKılıçarslan,Nermineng2022-11-11T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-42302022001001410Revistahttps://ramb.amb.org.br/ultimas-edicoes/#https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||ramb@amb.org.br1806-92820104-4230opendoar:2022-11-11T00:00Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of anesthesia type on outcome measures in cesarean section in the presence of fetal macrosomia
title Effect of anesthesia type on outcome measures in cesarean section in the presence of fetal macrosomia
spellingShingle Effect of anesthesia type on outcome measures in cesarean section in the presence of fetal macrosomia
Taşgöz,Fatma Nurgül
Cesarean section
Fetal macrosomia
General anesthesia
Pregnancy outcomes
Spinal anesthesia
title_short Effect of anesthesia type on outcome measures in cesarean section in the presence of fetal macrosomia
title_full Effect of anesthesia type on outcome measures in cesarean section in the presence of fetal macrosomia
title_fullStr Effect of anesthesia type on outcome measures in cesarean section in the presence of fetal macrosomia
title_full_unstemmed Effect of anesthesia type on outcome measures in cesarean section in the presence of fetal macrosomia
title_sort Effect of anesthesia type on outcome measures in cesarean section in the presence of fetal macrosomia
author Taşgöz,Fatma Nurgül
author_facet Taşgöz,Fatma Nurgül
Kılıçarslan,Nermin
author_role author
author2 Kılıçarslan,Nermin
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Taşgöz,Fatma Nurgül
Kılıçarslan,Nermin
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cesarean section
Fetal macrosomia
General anesthesia
Pregnancy outcomes
Spinal anesthesia
topic Cesarean section
Fetal macrosomia
General anesthesia
Pregnancy outcomes
Spinal anesthesia
description SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of general and spinal anesthesia on maternal and neonatal outcomes during cesarean section in pregnancies with macrosomia. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 1043 patients who delivered by cesarean section between May 2018 and December 2021 and had a baby born with a birth weight of 4000 g or greater. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared according to the type of anesthesia performed in the spinal anesthesia group (n=903; 86.6%) and general anesthesia group (n=140; 13.4%). The Apgar score was categorized into <7 and ≥7. RESULTS: Neonates with an Apgar score of <7 at the first minute (11.4 vs. 0.4%; p<0.001) and the fifth minute (2.9 vs. 0.3%; p=0.004) were significantly higher in the general anesthesia group. The preoperative and postoperative hematocrit difference was significantly lower in patients who received spinal anesthesia than those who received general anesthesia [2 (1.1–3.1) vs. 4.05 (2.8–5.35); p<0.001]. The number of patients transfused was higher in the general anesthesia group (9.3 vs. 2.7%; p<0.001). In the regression model, general anesthesia, birth weight, and emergency conditions were significant independent factors related to the preoperative and postoperative hematocrit decrease (p<0.001, p=0.005, and p=0.034, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Apgar scores of <7 at the first and fifth minutes are higher in macrosomic neonates who received general anesthesia than in neonates who received spinal anesthesia. Performing cesarean section under general anesthesia in mothers of macrosomic neonates results in a greater decrease in hematocrit value and a greater need for blood transfusion than under spinal anesthesia.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302022001001410
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302022001001410
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1806-9282.20220382
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Médica Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Médica Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.68 n.10 2022
reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
instacron:AMB
instname_str Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
instacron_str AMB
institution AMB
reponame_str Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
collection Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ramb@amb.org.br
_version_ 1754212838170165248