Immunosuppression in Small Bowel and Multivisceral Transplantation – Literature Review

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Trevizol, Alisson Paulino
Publication Date: 2011
Other Authors: Takata, Pedro, Pécora, Rafael Arruda, David, André Ibrahim
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Brazilian Journal of Transplantation
Download full: https://bjt.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/216
Summary: Introduction: Advances in immunosuppression protocols, early diagnosis and appropriate management of Acute Cellular Rejection made Small-Bowel, Multivisceral and Modified Multivisceral Transplantation feasible. Purpose: Analyze major transplantation centers immu- nosuppression protocols. Methods: Literature review based on PubMed indexed articles, published between 2006 to 2012, focusing on adult recipients. A total of 211 adults were transplanted in seven transplantation centers. Three immunosuppression protocols were used: Protocol 1: Induction with Daclizumab and maintenance with Tacrolimus and corticosteroids. Protocol 2: Induction with Alemtuzumab and main- tenance with Tacrolimus. Protocol 3: Induction with Thymoglobulin and Rituximab and maintenance with Tacrolimus. Results: Protocol 2 had the lowest rate of acute rejection (34%), while Protocols 1 and 3 had 54% and 48% respectively. The survival rate 1 year was 70%, 79% and 81% in Protocols 1,2 and 3, respectively. Conclusion: Protocol 2 used a more potent immunosuppressant capable of reducing the level of acute cellular rejection. However, it had a lower one-year patient survival rate, possibly due to severe sepsis agravated by the strong immunosuppression. Protocol 3 seems to be the best protocol, capable of elevating patient survival rate.
id ABTO_b7c73f1878b7aff098613ba400b9b8e5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs3.emnuvens.com.br:article/216
network_acronym_str ABTO
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Transplantation
repository_id_str
spelling Immunosuppression in Small Bowel and Multivisceral Transplantation – Literature ReviewIMUNOSSUPRESSÃO NO TRANSPLANTE DE INTESTINO E MULTIVISCERAL – REVISÃO DE LITERATURATransplanteImunossupressãoIntestino DelgadoRejeição de EnxertoTransplantationImunosupressionIntestine SmallGraft RejectionIntroduction: Advances in immunosuppression protocols, early diagnosis and appropriate management of Acute Cellular Rejection made Small-Bowel, Multivisceral and Modified Multivisceral Transplantation feasible. Purpose: Analyze major transplantation centers immu- nosuppression protocols. Methods: Literature review based on PubMed indexed articles, published between 2006 to 2012, focusing on adult recipients. A total of 211 adults were transplanted in seven transplantation centers. Three immunosuppression protocols were used: Protocol 1: Induction with Daclizumab and maintenance with Tacrolimus and corticosteroids. Protocol 2: Induction with Alemtuzumab and main- tenance with Tacrolimus. Protocol 3: Induction with Thymoglobulin and Rituximab and maintenance with Tacrolimus. Results: Protocol 2 had the lowest rate of acute rejection (34%), while Protocols 1 and 3 had 54% and 48% respectively. The survival rate 1 year was 70%, 79% and 81% in Protocols 1,2 and 3, respectively. Conclusion: Protocol 2 used a more potent immunosuppressant capable of reducing the level of acute cellular rejection. However, it had a lower one-year patient survival rate, possibly due to severe sepsis agravated by the strong immunosuppression. Protocol 3 seems to be the best protocol, capable of elevating patient survival rate.Introdução: Avanços nos protocolos de imunossupressão, diagnóstico precoce e manejo adequado da Rejeição Celular Aguda tornaram viável a realização do Transplante de Intestino Isolado, Multivisceral e Multivisceral Modificado. Objetivo: Analisar os protocolos de imunossupressão dos principais centros de transplante. Método: Revisão de artigos indexados ao PubMed, publicados no período de 2006 a 2012, com foco em receptores adultos. Um total de 211 adultos foi transplantado em sete centros. A imunossupressão foi realizada de três maneiras: Protocolo 1: Indução com Daclizumab e manutenção com Tacrolimus e corticosteróides. Protocolo 2: Indução com Alemtuzumab e manutenção com Tacrolimus. Protocolo 3: Indução com Timoglobulina e Rituximab e Tacrolimus. Resultados: Protocolo 2 teve a menor taxa de rejeição aguda (34%) e os Protocolos 1 e 3 tiveram 54% e 48%, respectivamente. A taxa de sobrevida de um ano foi de 70%, 79%, e 81% nos Protocolos 1,2 e 3, respectivamente. No Protocolo 3, a sobrevida de um ano para transplante de intestino e para transplante multi- visceral separadas foi 86% e 79%, respectivamente. Conclusão: Protocolo 2 utilizou imunossupressores mais potentes, capazes de reduzir a taxa de rejeição celular aguda, no entanto, apresentou menor taxa de sobrevida de um ano, possivelmente devido a um aumento de sepse grave devido à imunossupressão mais forte. O Protocolo 3 apresenta-se aparentemente como a melhor opção, com sobrevidas superiores.Associação Brasileira de Transplante de Órgãos (ABTO)2011-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://bjt.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/21610.53855/bjt.v14i4.216Brazilian Journal of Transplantation; Vol. 14 No. 4 (2011); 1610-1613Brazilian Journal of Transplantation; v. 14 n. 4 (2011); 1610-16132764-1589reponame:Brazilian Journal of Transplantationinstname:Associação Brasileira de Transplante de Órgãos (ABTO)instacron:ABTOporhttps://bjt.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/216/201Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Transplantationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTrevizol, Alisson PaulinoTakata, PedroPécora, Rafael ArrudaDavid, André Ibrahim2021-09-28T14:29:50Zoai:ojs3.emnuvens.com.br:article/216Revistahttps://bjt.emnuvens.com.br/revistaONGhttps://bjt.emnuvens.com.br/revista/oaibjt@abto.org.brhttps://doi.org/10.53855/2764-15892764-1589opendoar:2021-09-28T14:29:50Brazilian Journal of Transplantation - Associação Brasileira de Transplante de Órgãos (ABTO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Immunosuppression in Small Bowel and Multivisceral Transplantation – Literature Review
IMUNOSSUPRESSÃO NO TRANSPLANTE DE INTESTINO E MULTIVISCERAL – REVISÃO DE LITERATURA
title Immunosuppression in Small Bowel and Multivisceral Transplantation – Literature Review
spellingShingle Immunosuppression in Small Bowel and Multivisceral Transplantation – Literature Review
Trevizol, Alisson Paulino
Transplante
Imunossupressão
Intestino Delgado
Rejeição de Enxerto
Transplantation
Imunosupression
Intestine Small
Graft Rejection
title_short Immunosuppression in Small Bowel and Multivisceral Transplantation – Literature Review
title_full Immunosuppression in Small Bowel and Multivisceral Transplantation – Literature Review
title_fullStr Immunosuppression in Small Bowel and Multivisceral Transplantation – Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Immunosuppression in Small Bowel and Multivisceral Transplantation – Literature Review
title_sort Immunosuppression in Small Bowel and Multivisceral Transplantation – Literature Review
author Trevizol, Alisson Paulino
author_facet Trevizol, Alisson Paulino
Takata, Pedro
Pécora, Rafael Arruda
David, André Ibrahim
author_role author
author2 Takata, Pedro
Pécora, Rafael Arruda
David, André Ibrahim
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Trevizol, Alisson Paulino
Takata, Pedro
Pécora, Rafael Arruda
David, André Ibrahim
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Transplante
Imunossupressão
Intestino Delgado
Rejeição de Enxerto
Transplantation
Imunosupression
Intestine Small
Graft Rejection
topic Transplante
Imunossupressão
Intestino Delgado
Rejeição de Enxerto
Transplantation
Imunosupression
Intestine Small
Graft Rejection
description Introduction: Advances in immunosuppression protocols, early diagnosis and appropriate management of Acute Cellular Rejection made Small-Bowel, Multivisceral and Modified Multivisceral Transplantation feasible. Purpose: Analyze major transplantation centers immu- nosuppression protocols. Methods: Literature review based on PubMed indexed articles, published between 2006 to 2012, focusing on adult recipients. A total of 211 adults were transplanted in seven transplantation centers. Three immunosuppression protocols were used: Protocol 1: Induction with Daclizumab and maintenance with Tacrolimus and corticosteroids. Protocol 2: Induction with Alemtuzumab and main- tenance with Tacrolimus. Protocol 3: Induction with Thymoglobulin and Rituximab and maintenance with Tacrolimus. Results: Protocol 2 had the lowest rate of acute rejection (34%), while Protocols 1 and 3 had 54% and 48% respectively. The survival rate 1 year was 70%, 79% and 81% in Protocols 1,2 and 3, respectively. Conclusion: Protocol 2 used a more potent immunosuppressant capable of reducing the level of acute cellular rejection. However, it had a lower one-year patient survival rate, possibly due to severe sepsis agravated by the strong immunosuppression. Protocol 3 seems to be the best protocol, capable of elevating patient survival rate.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://bjt.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/216
10.53855/bjt.v14i4.216
url https://bjt.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/216
identifier_str_mv 10.53855/bjt.v14i4.216
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://bjt.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/216/201
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Transplantation
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Transplantation
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Transplante de Órgãos (ABTO)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Transplante de Órgãos (ABTO)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Transplantation; Vol. 14 No. 4 (2011); 1610-1613
Brazilian Journal of Transplantation; v. 14 n. 4 (2011); 1610-1613
2764-1589
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Transplantation
instname:Associação Brasileira de Transplante de Órgãos (ABTO)
instacron:ABTO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Transplante de Órgãos (ABTO)
instacron_str ABTO
institution ABTO
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Transplantation
collection Brazilian Journal of Transplantation
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Transplantation - Associação Brasileira de Transplante de Órgãos (ABTO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjt@abto.org.br
_version_ 1836111233859715072