Immunosuppression in Small Bowel and Multivisceral Transplantation – Literature Review
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2011 |
Other Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | por |
Source: | Brazilian Journal of Transplantation |
Download full: | https://bjt.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/216 |
Summary: | Introduction: Advances in immunosuppression protocols, early diagnosis and appropriate management of Acute Cellular Rejection made Small-Bowel, Multivisceral and Modified Multivisceral Transplantation feasible. Purpose: Analyze major transplantation centers immu- nosuppression protocols. Methods: Literature review based on PubMed indexed articles, published between 2006 to 2012, focusing on adult recipients. A total of 211 adults were transplanted in seven transplantation centers. Three immunosuppression protocols were used: Protocol 1: Induction with Daclizumab and maintenance with Tacrolimus and corticosteroids. Protocol 2: Induction with Alemtuzumab and main- tenance with Tacrolimus. Protocol 3: Induction with Thymoglobulin and Rituximab and maintenance with Tacrolimus. Results: Protocol 2 had the lowest rate of acute rejection (34%), while Protocols 1 and 3 had 54% and 48% respectively. The survival rate 1 year was 70%, 79% and 81% in Protocols 1,2 and 3, respectively. Conclusion: Protocol 2 used a more potent immunosuppressant capable of reducing the level of acute cellular rejection. However, it had a lower one-year patient survival rate, possibly due to severe sepsis agravated by the strong immunosuppression. Protocol 3 seems to be the best protocol, capable of elevating patient survival rate. |
id |
ABTO_b7c73f1878b7aff098613ba400b9b8e5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs3.emnuvens.com.br:article/216 |
network_acronym_str |
ABTO |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Transplantation |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Immunosuppression in Small Bowel and Multivisceral Transplantation – Literature ReviewIMUNOSSUPRESSÃO NO TRANSPLANTE DE INTESTINO E MULTIVISCERAL – REVISÃO DE LITERATURATransplanteImunossupressãoIntestino DelgadoRejeição de EnxertoTransplantationImunosupressionIntestine SmallGraft RejectionIntroduction: Advances in immunosuppression protocols, early diagnosis and appropriate management of Acute Cellular Rejection made Small-Bowel, Multivisceral and Modified Multivisceral Transplantation feasible. Purpose: Analyze major transplantation centers immu- nosuppression protocols. Methods: Literature review based on PubMed indexed articles, published between 2006 to 2012, focusing on adult recipients. A total of 211 adults were transplanted in seven transplantation centers. Three immunosuppression protocols were used: Protocol 1: Induction with Daclizumab and maintenance with Tacrolimus and corticosteroids. Protocol 2: Induction with Alemtuzumab and main- tenance with Tacrolimus. Protocol 3: Induction with Thymoglobulin and Rituximab and maintenance with Tacrolimus. Results: Protocol 2 had the lowest rate of acute rejection (34%), while Protocols 1 and 3 had 54% and 48% respectively. The survival rate 1 year was 70%, 79% and 81% in Protocols 1,2 and 3, respectively. Conclusion: Protocol 2 used a more potent immunosuppressant capable of reducing the level of acute cellular rejection. However, it had a lower one-year patient survival rate, possibly due to severe sepsis agravated by the strong immunosuppression. Protocol 3 seems to be the best protocol, capable of elevating patient survival rate.Introdução: Avanços nos protocolos de imunossupressão, diagnóstico precoce e manejo adequado da Rejeição Celular Aguda tornaram viável a realização do Transplante de Intestino Isolado, Multivisceral e Multivisceral Modificado. Objetivo: Analisar os protocolos de imunossupressão dos principais centros de transplante. Método: Revisão de artigos indexados ao PubMed, publicados no período de 2006 a 2012, com foco em receptores adultos. Um total de 211 adultos foi transplantado em sete centros. A imunossupressão foi realizada de três maneiras: Protocolo 1: Indução com Daclizumab e manutenção com Tacrolimus e corticosteróides. Protocolo 2: Indução com Alemtuzumab e manutenção com Tacrolimus. Protocolo 3: Indução com Timoglobulina e Rituximab e Tacrolimus. Resultados: Protocolo 2 teve a menor taxa de rejeição aguda (34%) e os Protocolos 1 e 3 tiveram 54% e 48%, respectivamente. A taxa de sobrevida de um ano foi de 70%, 79%, e 81% nos Protocolos 1,2 e 3, respectivamente. No Protocolo 3, a sobrevida de um ano para transplante de intestino e para transplante multi- visceral separadas foi 86% e 79%, respectivamente. Conclusão: Protocolo 2 utilizou imunossupressores mais potentes, capazes de reduzir a taxa de rejeição celular aguda, no entanto, apresentou menor taxa de sobrevida de um ano, possivelmente devido a um aumento de sepse grave devido à imunossupressão mais forte. O Protocolo 3 apresenta-se aparentemente como a melhor opção, com sobrevidas superiores.Associação Brasileira de Transplante de Órgãos (ABTO)2011-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://bjt.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/21610.53855/bjt.v14i4.216Brazilian Journal of Transplantation; Vol. 14 No. 4 (2011); 1610-1613Brazilian Journal of Transplantation; v. 14 n. 4 (2011); 1610-16132764-1589reponame:Brazilian Journal of Transplantationinstname:Associação Brasileira de Transplante de Órgãos (ABTO)instacron:ABTOporhttps://bjt.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/216/201Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Transplantationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTrevizol, Alisson PaulinoTakata, PedroPécora, Rafael ArrudaDavid, André Ibrahim2021-09-28T14:29:50Zoai:ojs3.emnuvens.com.br:article/216Revistahttps://bjt.emnuvens.com.br/revistaONGhttps://bjt.emnuvens.com.br/revista/oaibjt@abto.org.brhttps://doi.org/10.53855/2764-15892764-1589opendoar:2021-09-28T14:29:50Brazilian Journal of Transplantation - Associação Brasileira de Transplante de Órgãos (ABTO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Immunosuppression in Small Bowel and Multivisceral Transplantation – Literature Review IMUNOSSUPRESSÃO NO TRANSPLANTE DE INTESTINO E MULTIVISCERAL – REVISÃO DE LITERATURA |
title |
Immunosuppression in Small Bowel and Multivisceral Transplantation – Literature Review |
spellingShingle |
Immunosuppression in Small Bowel and Multivisceral Transplantation – Literature Review Trevizol, Alisson Paulino Transplante Imunossupressão Intestino Delgado Rejeição de Enxerto Transplantation Imunosupression Intestine Small Graft Rejection |
title_short |
Immunosuppression in Small Bowel and Multivisceral Transplantation – Literature Review |
title_full |
Immunosuppression in Small Bowel and Multivisceral Transplantation – Literature Review |
title_fullStr |
Immunosuppression in Small Bowel and Multivisceral Transplantation – Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Immunosuppression in Small Bowel and Multivisceral Transplantation – Literature Review |
title_sort |
Immunosuppression in Small Bowel and Multivisceral Transplantation – Literature Review |
author |
Trevizol, Alisson Paulino |
author_facet |
Trevizol, Alisson Paulino Takata, Pedro Pécora, Rafael Arruda David, André Ibrahim |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Takata, Pedro Pécora, Rafael Arruda David, André Ibrahim |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Trevizol, Alisson Paulino Takata, Pedro Pécora, Rafael Arruda David, André Ibrahim |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Transplante Imunossupressão Intestino Delgado Rejeição de Enxerto Transplantation Imunosupression Intestine Small Graft Rejection |
topic |
Transplante Imunossupressão Intestino Delgado Rejeição de Enxerto Transplantation Imunosupression Intestine Small Graft Rejection |
description |
Introduction: Advances in immunosuppression protocols, early diagnosis and appropriate management of Acute Cellular Rejection made Small-Bowel, Multivisceral and Modified Multivisceral Transplantation feasible. Purpose: Analyze major transplantation centers immu- nosuppression protocols. Methods: Literature review based on PubMed indexed articles, published between 2006 to 2012, focusing on adult recipients. A total of 211 adults were transplanted in seven transplantation centers. Three immunosuppression protocols were used: Protocol 1: Induction with Daclizumab and maintenance with Tacrolimus and corticosteroids. Protocol 2: Induction with Alemtuzumab and main- tenance with Tacrolimus. Protocol 3: Induction with Thymoglobulin and Rituximab and maintenance with Tacrolimus. Results: Protocol 2 had the lowest rate of acute rejection (34%), while Protocols 1 and 3 had 54% and 48% respectively. The survival rate 1 year was 70%, 79% and 81% in Protocols 1,2 and 3, respectively. Conclusion: Protocol 2 used a more potent immunosuppressant capable of reducing the level of acute cellular rejection. However, it had a lower one-year patient survival rate, possibly due to severe sepsis agravated by the strong immunosuppression. Protocol 3 seems to be the best protocol, capable of elevating patient survival rate. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://bjt.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/216 10.53855/bjt.v14i4.216 |
url |
https://bjt.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/216 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.53855/bjt.v14i4.216 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://bjt.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/216/201 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Transplantation info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Transplantation |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Transplante de Órgãos (ABTO) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Transplante de Órgãos (ABTO) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Transplantation; Vol. 14 No. 4 (2011); 1610-1613 Brazilian Journal of Transplantation; v. 14 n. 4 (2011); 1610-1613 2764-1589 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Transplantation instname:Associação Brasileira de Transplante de Órgãos (ABTO) instacron:ABTO |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Transplante de Órgãos (ABTO) |
instacron_str |
ABTO |
institution |
ABTO |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Transplantation |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Transplantation |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Transplantation - Associação Brasileira de Transplante de Órgãos (ABTO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bjt@abto.org.br |
_version_ |
1836111233859715072 |