Export Ready — 

Comparison of the efficacy of vocal training and vocal microsurgery in patients with early vocal fold polyp

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wang,Hanqing
Publication Date: 2019
Other Authors: Zhuge,Pan, You,Huihua, Zhang,Yulan, Zhang,Zhifeng
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-86942019000600678
Summary: Abstract Introduction: Vocal fold polyp is a benign proliferative disease in the superficial lamina propria of the vocal fold, and vocal microsurgery can improve the voice quality of patients with vocal fold polyp. In preliminary studies, we found that vocal training could improve the vocal quality of patients with early vocal fold polyp. Objective: This study aimed to compare the efficacies of vocal training and vocal microsurgery in patients with early vocal fold polyp. Methods: A total of 38 patients with early vocal fold polyp underwent 3 months of vocal training (VT group); another 31 patients with early vocal fold polyp underwent vocal microsurgery (VM group). All subjects were assessed using laryngostroboscopy, voice handicap index, and dysphonia severity index, and the efficacies of vocal training and vocal microsurgery were compared. Results: The cure rates of vocal training and vocal microsurgery were 31.6% (12/38) and 100% (31/31), respectively. The intragroup paired-sample t-test showed that the post treatment vocal handicap index, maximum phonation time, highest frequency (F0-high), lowest intensity (I-low), and dysphonia severity index in both the VT and VM groups were better than those before treatment, except for the jitter value. The intergroup independent-sample t-test revealed that the emotional values of vocal handicap index (t = − 2.22, p = 0.03), maximum phonation time (t = 2.54, p = 0.013), jitter (t = − 2.11, p = 0.03), and dysphonia severity index (t = 3.24, p = 0.002) in the VT group were better than those in the VM group. Conclusions: Both, vocal training and vocal microsurgery could improve the voice quality of patients with early vocal fold polyp, and these methods present different advantages.
id ABORL-F-1_39c57c263f04b4a73a914a7f770cb17a
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1808-86942019000600678
network_acronym_str ABORL-F-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of the efficacy of vocal training and vocal microsurgery in patients with early vocal fold polypEarly vocal fold polypVoice trainingVoice microsurgeryLaryngostroboscopyVoice handicap indexDysphonia severity indexAbstract Introduction: Vocal fold polyp is a benign proliferative disease in the superficial lamina propria of the vocal fold, and vocal microsurgery can improve the voice quality of patients with vocal fold polyp. In preliminary studies, we found that vocal training could improve the vocal quality of patients with early vocal fold polyp. Objective: This study aimed to compare the efficacies of vocal training and vocal microsurgery in patients with early vocal fold polyp. Methods: A total of 38 patients with early vocal fold polyp underwent 3 months of vocal training (VT group); another 31 patients with early vocal fold polyp underwent vocal microsurgery (VM group). All subjects were assessed using laryngostroboscopy, voice handicap index, and dysphonia severity index, and the efficacies of vocal training and vocal microsurgery were compared. Results: The cure rates of vocal training and vocal microsurgery were 31.6% (12/38) and 100% (31/31), respectively. The intragroup paired-sample t-test showed that the post treatment vocal handicap index, maximum phonation time, highest frequency (F0-high), lowest intensity (I-low), and dysphonia severity index in both the VT and VM groups were better than those before treatment, except for the jitter value. The intergroup independent-sample t-test revealed that the emotional values of vocal handicap index (t = − 2.22, p = 0.03), maximum phonation time (t = 2.54, p = 0.013), jitter (t = − 2.11, p = 0.03), and dysphonia severity index (t = 3.24, p = 0.002) in the VT group were better than those in the VM group. Conclusions: Both, vocal training and vocal microsurgery could improve the voice quality of patients with early vocal fold polyp, and these methods present different advantages.Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial.2019-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-86942019000600678Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology v.85 n.6 2019reponame:Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngologyinstname:Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF)instacron:ABORL-CCF10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.03.014info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWang,HanqingZhuge,PanYou,HuihuaZhang,YulanZhang,Zhifengeng2019-12-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-86942019000600678Revistahttp://www.bjorl.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevista@aborlccf.org.br||revista@aborlccf.org.br1808-86861808-8686opendoar:2019-12-09T00:00Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of the efficacy of vocal training and vocal microsurgery in patients with early vocal fold polyp
title Comparison of the efficacy of vocal training and vocal microsurgery in patients with early vocal fold polyp
spellingShingle Comparison of the efficacy of vocal training and vocal microsurgery in patients with early vocal fold polyp
Wang,Hanqing
Early vocal fold polyp
Voice training
Voice microsurgery
Laryngostroboscopy
Voice handicap index
Dysphonia severity index
title_short Comparison of the efficacy of vocal training and vocal microsurgery in patients with early vocal fold polyp
title_full Comparison of the efficacy of vocal training and vocal microsurgery in patients with early vocal fold polyp
title_fullStr Comparison of the efficacy of vocal training and vocal microsurgery in patients with early vocal fold polyp
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the efficacy of vocal training and vocal microsurgery in patients with early vocal fold polyp
title_sort Comparison of the efficacy of vocal training and vocal microsurgery in patients with early vocal fold polyp
author Wang,Hanqing
author_facet Wang,Hanqing
Zhuge,Pan
You,Huihua
Zhang,Yulan
Zhang,Zhifeng
author_role author
author2 Zhuge,Pan
You,Huihua
Zhang,Yulan
Zhang,Zhifeng
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Wang,Hanqing
Zhuge,Pan
You,Huihua
Zhang,Yulan
Zhang,Zhifeng
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Early vocal fold polyp
Voice training
Voice microsurgery
Laryngostroboscopy
Voice handicap index
Dysphonia severity index
topic Early vocal fold polyp
Voice training
Voice microsurgery
Laryngostroboscopy
Voice handicap index
Dysphonia severity index
description Abstract Introduction: Vocal fold polyp is a benign proliferative disease in the superficial lamina propria of the vocal fold, and vocal microsurgery can improve the voice quality of patients with vocal fold polyp. In preliminary studies, we found that vocal training could improve the vocal quality of patients with early vocal fold polyp. Objective: This study aimed to compare the efficacies of vocal training and vocal microsurgery in patients with early vocal fold polyp. Methods: A total of 38 patients with early vocal fold polyp underwent 3 months of vocal training (VT group); another 31 patients with early vocal fold polyp underwent vocal microsurgery (VM group). All subjects were assessed using laryngostroboscopy, voice handicap index, and dysphonia severity index, and the efficacies of vocal training and vocal microsurgery were compared. Results: The cure rates of vocal training and vocal microsurgery were 31.6% (12/38) and 100% (31/31), respectively. The intragroup paired-sample t-test showed that the post treatment vocal handicap index, maximum phonation time, highest frequency (F0-high), lowest intensity (I-low), and dysphonia severity index in both the VT and VM groups were better than those before treatment, except for the jitter value. The intergroup independent-sample t-test revealed that the emotional values of vocal handicap index (t = − 2.22, p = 0.03), maximum phonation time (t = 2.54, p = 0.013), jitter (t = − 2.11, p = 0.03), and dysphonia severity index (t = 3.24, p = 0.002) in the VT group were better than those in the VM group. Conclusions: Both, vocal training and vocal microsurgery could improve the voice quality of patients with early vocal fold polyp, and these methods present different advantages.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-86942019000600678
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-86942019000600678
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.03.014
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology v.85 n.6 2019
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
instname:Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF)
instacron:ABORL-CCF
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF)
instacron_str ABORL-CCF
institution ABORL-CCF
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
collection Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@aborlccf.org.br||revista@aborlccf.org.br
_version_ 1754575993666797568