Evaluation of the sampling methods applied to phycoperiphyton studies in the Ratones River estuary, Brazil

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vettorato,Bianca
Publication Date: 2010
Other Authors: Laudares-Silva,Roselane, Talgatti,Dávia, Menezes,Mariângela
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia (Online)
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-975X2010000300002
Summary: AIM: The present study aimed on testing the efficiency of four sampling methods for identification and quantification applied in studies on the biodiversity and spatial-temporal distribution of the phycoperiphyton in the Ratones River estuary; METHODS: The sampling were carried out in three sampling stations along the Ratones River in March and August 2008. The methodologies used for the separation of the periphyton from the sediment were made with the use of sieves and trapping tissue. A removing method through manual agitation and "in situ" analysis was used for epiphytes. To evaluate the efficiency of the methodology for periphyton, data on phytoplankton was included for comparative reasons; RESULTS: The trapping method option was the most appropriate for removing the live specimens from the sediment, and to try to minimize the problems found with the other two methodologies tested. In the case of the epiphytic microalgae the best counting technique resulted from the "in situ" method; CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the results presented here support the difficulties faced in studying phycoperiphytic samples in estuaries, which are shallow and dynamic environments, and for that reason the communities occurring in these areas are constantly influenced by the sediment.
id ABL-1_8ebd7685d3a872ee7cf8d2e4ec81e9ca
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2179-975X2010000300002
network_acronym_str ABL-1
network_name_str Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of the sampling methods applied to phycoperiphyton studies in the Ratones River estuary, Brazilsampling methodsestuaryepipelicepiphyticphytoplanctonAIM: The present study aimed on testing the efficiency of four sampling methods for identification and quantification applied in studies on the biodiversity and spatial-temporal distribution of the phycoperiphyton in the Ratones River estuary; METHODS: The sampling were carried out in three sampling stations along the Ratones River in March and August 2008. The methodologies used for the separation of the periphyton from the sediment were made with the use of sieves and trapping tissue. A removing method through manual agitation and "in situ" analysis was used for epiphytes. To evaluate the efficiency of the methodology for periphyton, data on phytoplankton was included for comparative reasons; RESULTS: The trapping method option was the most appropriate for removing the live specimens from the sediment, and to try to minimize the problems found with the other two methodologies tested. In the case of the epiphytic microalgae the best counting technique resulted from the "in situ" method; CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the results presented here support the difficulties faced in studying phycoperiphytic samples in estuaries, which are shallow and dynamic environments, and for that reason the communities occurring in these areas are constantly influenced by the sediment.Associação Brasileira de Limnologia2010-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-975X2010000300002Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia v.22 n.3 2010reponame:Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Limnologia (ABL)instacron:ABL10.4322/actalb.02203002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVettorato,BiancaLaudares-Silva,RoselaneTalgatti,DáviaMenezes,Mariângelaeng2011-04-11T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2179-975X2010000300002Revistahttp://www.ablimno.org.br/publiActa.phphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||actalb@rc.unesp.br2179-975X0102-6712opendoar:2011-04-11T00:00Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Limnologia (ABL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of the sampling methods applied to phycoperiphyton studies in the Ratones River estuary, Brazil
title Evaluation of the sampling methods applied to phycoperiphyton studies in the Ratones River estuary, Brazil
spellingShingle Evaluation of the sampling methods applied to phycoperiphyton studies in the Ratones River estuary, Brazil
Vettorato,Bianca
sampling methods
estuary
epipelic
epiphytic
phytoplancton
title_short Evaluation of the sampling methods applied to phycoperiphyton studies in the Ratones River estuary, Brazil
title_full Evaluation of the sampling methods applied to phycoperiphyton studies in the Ratones River estuary, Brazil
title_fullStr Evaluation of the sampling methods applied to phycoperiphyton studies in the Ratones River estuary, Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the sampling methods applied to phycoperiphyton studies in the Ratones River estuary, Brazil
title_sort Evaluation of the sampling methods applied to phycoperiphyton studies in the Ratones River estuary, Brazil
author Vettorato,Bianca
author_facet Vettorato,Bianca
Laudares-Silva,Roselane
Talgatti,Dávia
Menezes,Mariângela
author_role author
author2 Laudares-Silva,Roselane
Talgatti,Dávia
Menezes,Mariângela
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vettorato,Bianca
Laudares-Silva,Roselane
Talgatti,Dávia
Menezes,Mariângela
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv sampling methods
estuary
epipelic
epiphytic
phytoplancton
topic sampling methods
estuary
epipelic
epiphytic
phytoplancton
description AIM: The present study aimed on testing the efficiency of four sampling methods for identification and quantification applied in studies on the biodiversity and spatial-temporal distribution of the phycoperiphyton in the Ratones River estuary; METHODS: The sampling were carried out in three sampling stations along the Ratones River in March and August 2008. The methodologies used for the separation of the periphyton from the sediment were made with the use of sieves and trapping tissue. A removing method through manual agitation and "in situ" analysis was used for epiphytes. To evaluate the efficiency of the methodology for periphyton, data on phytoplankton was included for comparative reasons; RESULTS: The trapping method option was the most appropriate for removing the live specimens from the sediment, and to try to minimize the problems found with the other two methodologies tested. In the case of the epiphytic microalgae the best counting technique resulted from the "in situ" method; CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the results presented here support the difficulties faced in studying phycoperiphytic samples in estuaries, which are shallow and dynamic environments, and for that reason the communities occurring in these areas are constantly influenced by the sediment.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-975X2010000300002
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-975X2010000300002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.4322/actalb.02203002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Limnologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Limnologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia v.22 n.3 2010
reponame:Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Limnologia (ABL)
instacron:ABL
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Limnologia (ABL)
instacron_str ABL
institution ABL
reponame_str Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia (Online)
collection Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Limnologia (ABL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||actalb@rc.unesp.br
_version_ 1754212635591573504