Political Science in Latin America: A Scientometric Analysis

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Codato,Adriano
Publication Date: 2020
Other Authors: Madeira,Rafael, Bittencourt,Maiane
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Brazilian Political Science Review
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212020000300202
Summary: Studies of Latin American political science are centered on analyses of national cases and are based on intellectual narratives about the institutional development and teaching of the discipline. In this article we take a different, more comprehensive and comparative approach. We distinguish and contrast two Latin American political sciences: one native to Latin America and published in journals from five countries in the region, and one foreign and published in journals from five countries outside the region. We use three types of bibliometric measures: 01. reciprocal citations in 23 academic journals indexed in the Scopus database; 02. co-occurrence of terms in titles and abstracts of 5,880 research articles published between 2006 and 2018; and 03. co-citations of authors in the bibliographies of said articles. The network of journals forms a well-defined archipelago with three clusters separated by language (English, Spanish and Portuguese). The community is divided along two main axes: political approaches versus sociological approaches. The study also points out that themes, authors, and methodologies are not significantly different between these two political sciences.
id ABCP-1_2bc374aeb2ded01589fb71a51b94fcee
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1981-38212020000300202
network_acronym_str ABCP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Political Science Review
repository_id_str
spelling Political Science in Latin America: A Scientometric AnalysisScience mappingbibliometric methodstheoretical traditionspolitical science journalsLatin American Political ScienceStudies of Latin American political science are centered on analyses of national cases and are based on intellectual narratives about the institutional development and teaching of the discipline. In this article we take a different, more comprehensive and comparative approach. We distinguish and contrast two Latin American political sciences: one native to Latin America and published in journals from five countries in the region, and one foreign and published in journals from five countries outside the region. We use three types of bibliometric measures: 01. reciprocal citations in 23 academic journals indexed in the Scopus database; 02. co-occurrence of terms in titles and abstracts of 5,880 research articles published between 2006 and 2018; and 03. co-citations of authors in the bibliographies of said articles. The network of journals forms a well-defined archipelago with three clusters separated by language (English, Spanish and Portuguese). The community is divided along two main axes: political approaches versus sociological approaches. The study also points out that themes, authors, and methodologies are not significantly different between these two political sciences.Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212020000300202Brazilian Political Science Review v.14 n.3 2020reponame:Brazilian Political Science Reviewinstname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)instacron:ABCP10.1590/1981-3821202000030005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCodato,AdrianoMadeira,RafaelBittencourt,Maianeeng2020-12-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1981-38212020000300202Revistahttps://brazilianpoliticalsciencereview.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br1981-38211981-3821opendoar:2020-12-09T00:00Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Political Science in Latin America: A Scientometric Analysis
title Political Science in Latin America: A Scientometric Analysis
spellingShingle Political Science in Latin America: A Scientometric Analysis
Codato,Adriano
Science mapping
bibliometric methods
theoretical traditions
political science journals
Latin American Political Science
title_short Political Science in Latin America: A Scientometric Analysis
title_full Political Science in Latin America: A Scientometric Analysis
title_fullStr Political Science in Latin America: A Scientometric Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Political Science in Latin America: A Scientometric Analysis
title_sort Political Science in Latin America: A Scientometric Analysis
author Codato,Adriano
author_facet Codato,Adriano
Madeira,Rafael
Bittencourt,Maiane
author_role author
author2 Madeira,Rafael
Bittencourt,Maiane
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Codato,Adriano
Madeira,Rafael
Bittencourt,Maiane
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Science mapping
bibliometric methods
theoretical traditions
political science journals
Latin American Political Science
topic Science mapping
bibliometric methods
theoretical traditions
political science journals
Latin American Political Science
description Studies of Latin American political science are centered on analyses of national cases and are based on intellectual narratives about the institutional development and teaching of the discipline. In this article we take a different, more comprehensive and comparative approach. We distinguish and contrast two Latin American political sciences: one native to Latin America and published in journals from five countries in the region, and one foreign and published in journals from five countries outside the region. We use three types of bibliometric measures: 01. reciprocal citations in 23 academic journals indexed in the Scopus database; 02. co-occurrence of terms in titles and abstracts of 5,880 research articles published between 2006 and 2018; and 03. co-citations of authors in the bibliographies of said articles. The network of journals forms a well-defined archipelago with three clusters separated by language (English, Spanish and Portuguese). The community is divided along two main axes: political approaches versus sociological approaches. The study also points out that themes, authors, and methodologies are not significantly different between these two political sciences.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212020000300202
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212020000300202
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1981-3821202000030005
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Political Science Review v.14 n.3 2020
reponame:Brazilian Political Science Review
instname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
instacron:ABCP
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
instacron_str ABCP
institution ABCP
reponame_str Brazilian Political Science Review
collection Brazilian Political Science Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br
_version_ 1754302908277456896