Political Science in Latin America: A Scientometric Analysis
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2020 |
Other Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Brazilian Political Science Review |
Download full: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212020000300202 |
Summary: | Studies of Latin American political science are centered on analyses of national cases and are based on intellectual narratives about the institutional development and teaching of the discipline. In this article we take a different, more comprehensive and comparative approach. We distinguish and contrast two Latin American political sciences: one native to Latin America and published in journals from five countries in the region, and one foreign and published in journals from five countries outside the region. We use three types of bibliometric measures: 01. reciprocal citations in 23 academic journals indexed in the Scopus database; 02. co-occurrence of terms in titles and abstracts of 5,880 research articles published between 2006 and 2018; and 03. co-citations of authors in the bibliographies of said articles. The network of journals forms a well-defined archipelago with three clusters separated by language (English, Spanish and Portuguese). The community is divided along two main axes: political approaches versus sociological approaches. The study also points out that themes, authors, and methodologies are not significantly different between these two political sciences. |
id |
ABCP-1_2bc374aeb2ded01589fb71a51b94fcee |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1981-38212020000300202 |
network_acronym_str |
ABCP-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Political Science Review |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Political Science in Latin America: A Scientometric AnalysisScience mappingbibliometric methodstheoretical traditionspolitical science journalsLatin American Political ScienceStudies of Latin American political science are centered on analyses of national cases and are based on intellectual narratives about the institutional development and teaching of the discipline. In this article we take a different, more comprehensive and comparative approach. We distinguish and contrast two Latin American political sciences: one native to Latin America and published in journals from five countries in the region, and one foreign and published in journals from five countries outside the region. We use three types of bibliometric measures: 01. reciprocal citations in 23 academic journals indexed in the Scopus database; 02. co-occurrence of terms in titles and abstracts of 5,880 research articles published between 2006 and 2018; and 03. co-citations of authors in the bibliographies of said articles. The network of journals forms a well-defined archipelago with three clusters separated by language (English, Spanish and Portuguese). The community is divided along two main axes: political approaches versus sociological approaches. The study also points out that themes, authors, and methodologies are not significantly different between these two political sciences.Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212020000300202Brazilian Political Science Review v.14 n.3 2020reponame:Brazilian Political Science Reviewinstname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)instacron:ABCP10.1590/1981-3821202000030005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCodato,AdrianoMadeira,RafaelBittencourt,Maianeeng2020-12-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1981-38212020000300202Revistahttps://brazilianpoliticalsciencereview.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br1981-38211981-3821opendoar:2020-12-09T00:00Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Political Science in Latin America: A Scientometric Analysis |
title |
Political Science in Latin America: A Scientometric Analysis |
spellingShingle |
Political Science in Latin America: A Scientometric Analysis Codato,Adriano Science mapping bibliometric methods theoretical traditions political science journals Latin American Political Science |
title_short |
Political Science in Latin America: A Scientometric Analysis |
title_full |
Political Science in Latin America: A Scientometric Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Political Science in Latin America: A Scientometric Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Political Science in Latin America: A Scientometric Analysis |
title_sort |
Political Science in Latin America: A Scientometric Analysis |
author |
Codato,Adriano |
author_facet |
Codato,Adriano Madeira,Rafael Bittencourt,Maiane |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Madeira,Rafael Bittencourt,Maiane |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Codato,Adriano Madeira,Rafael Bittencourt,Maiane |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Science mapping bibliometric methods theoretical traditions political science journals Latin American Political Science |
topic |
Science mapping bibliometric methods theoretical traditions political science journals Latin American Political Science |
description |
Studies of Latin American political science are centered on analyses of national cases and are based on intellectual narratives about the institutional development and teaching of the discipline. In this article we take a different, more comprehensive and comparative approach. We distinguish and contrast two Latin American political sciences: one native to Latin America and published in journals from five countries in the region, and one foreign and published in journals from five countries outside the region. We use three types of bibliometric measures: 01. reciprocal citations in 23 academic journals indexed in the Scopus database; 02. co-occurrence of terms in titles and abstracts of 5,880 research articles published between 2006 and 2018; and 03. co-citations of authors in the bibliographies of said articles. The network of journals forms a well-defined archipelago with three clusters separated by language (English, Spanish and Portuguese). The community is divided along two main axes: political approaches versus sociological approaches. The study also points out that themes, authors, and methodologies are not significantly different between these two political sciences. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212020000300202 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212020000300202 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1981-3821202000030005 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Political Science Review v.14 n.3 2020 reponame:Brazilian Political Science Review instname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP) instacron:ABCP |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP) |
instacron_str |
ABCP |
institution |
ABCP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Political Science Review |
collection |
Brazilian Political Science Review |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br |
_version_ |
1754302908277456896 |