Physiological responses and soil water balance of clonal Eucalyptus under contrasting spacings and genotypes

• Ano de defesa: 2016
• Autor(a) principal: Hakamada, Rodrigo Eiji
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: eng
• Instituição de defesa: Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP
• Palavras-chave em Português: Canopy interception; Densidade de plantio; Eficiência de uso da água; Evaporação do solo; Florestas plantadas; Interceptação da copa; Leaf water potential; Plantation forests; Planting density; Potencial hídrico foliar; Soil evaporation; Transpiração; Transpiration; Uso de água; Water use; Water use efficiency
• Link de acesso: http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/11/11150/tde-28112016-113417/

Planting density and genotype have close relationship with the water relations in plants. The scenario of increased occurrence of extreme weather events and the change of Eucalyptus forest plantations to high water deficit regions, led us to the three key questions of this study: (1) What is the relationship between planting density and the potential water stress? (2) The planting spacing interferes the water use efficiency (WUE), i.e. the amount of biomass produced by the amount of water transpired? (3) Can the planting density change the soil water balance (BHS)? To develop this work, we settled a field trial in Mogi Guacu, SP, in February 2012. We planted four genetic material (Eucalyptus grandis x E.urophylla1 {Urograndis1}, Eucalyptus grandis x E.urophylla2, E.urophylla and E.grandis x E.camaldulensis {Grancam}) with different levels of tolerance to drought and four planting spacings (3.4, 7.0, 10.5 and 16.9 m2 plant-1, which correspond to densities of 2,949 , 1,424 and 1,028 and 591 plants ha-1). In Chapter 1, we evaluated the leaf water potential (representing potential water stress) of the four clones for 1 year, between 1.5 and 2.5 years. Regardless of the genetic material, the higher the wood productivity, the greater the leaf water potential. The denser planting (2,949 plants ha-1) stands generated 39% more wood, however, water stress potential reached up to 33% higher than the least dense planting (591 plants ha-1). In the second chapter, during the same period, we evaluated the efficiency of water use, which did not vary according to the change of planting density, but showed differences between genotypes with US 2.3, 2.2 and 1, 5 g L-1 to Urograndis, Urophylla and Grancam, respectively, at a density of 1,424 plants ha-1. Finally, the third chapter evaluated for two years, between 1.7 and 3.7 years, transpiration (T), soil evaporation (Es) and canopy interception (Ei), which together made up evapotranspiration (ET). Subtraction of precipitation (P) per ET resulted in soil water balance (SWB). The SWB was positive or near zero for the two clones evaluated (Urograndis1 and Grancam) when planting density was less than or equal to 1,028 trees ha-1. In the denser planting, the balance was -25%. These studies show that: a higher wood growth results in a higher potential drought stress, generating a clear trade-off between production and survival of trees. However, the detailed study of genetic materials fall under that there are increasing opportunities in water use efficiency, though without the increase in water use, bringing a greater share of water in the watershed scale. Finally, plantations above 1,028 ha-1 trees resulted in a negative soil water balance of -25% at the peak of growth. Together, this study reveals that spacing associated with genotypes can serve as tools in the search for balance between timber production and conservation of natural resources.