Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2015 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Moscatello, Newton
 |
Orientador(a): |
Grecco, Marta Cristina Pelucio
 |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://dspace.mackenzie.br/handle/10899/26317
|
Resumo: |
This research studied the behavior of production of a mineral extraction company, comparing the absorption costing method and the method of funding through the use of the UEP-stress production Unit to verify that this method showed a generation of more detailed data and information management to the administration. To this end, we used the model script troubleshooting Business Project (Business Problem Solving) of AKEN; Berends (2012) and VANDENBOSCH (2003). We used the data of the expenses incurred to calculate the costing method of the UEP-production Effort unit. The results, as the calculation of the unit cost of production per tonne, pointed to a similarity of monetary value, however it was found that among the methods analyzed, the costing method of the UEP-production Effort Unit presented more detailed cost management information with regard to the production process and with higher quality for analysis, allowing a enabling a more analytical knowledge of manufacturing capacity and the possible idleness. Its simplicity of use and ease of adoption of this method becomes attractive. |