Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2023 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Farina, Luciane Schiffl
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Oudeste, Claudia Stumpf Toldo
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade de Passo Fundo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras
|
| Departamento: |
Instituto de Humanidades, Ciências, Educação e Criatividade - IHCEC
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://tede.upf.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/2552
|
Resumo: |
Writing is an act inherent to academic and professional life and even though it is a practice foreseen in official documents since Basic Education, students, especially freshmen, have difficulties in dealing with tasks that require reading and writing in the academic sphere. Thus, the present work is part of the concern of teaching in Higher Education with regard to textual production. Therefore, we seek to build a theoretical-methodological proposal for an evaluative-enunciative intervention, for the academic (re)writing of the opinion article. We rely on the theoretical-enunciative construct of Émile Benveniste, mainly in the articles in Problems of General Linguistics I (PLG I) and Problems of General Linguistics II (PLG II), in which the French linguist prioritizes the significance of the language in use, in an anthropological dimension of language, highlighting the place of the subject, insofar as it is constituted in and by language. The research corpus is composed of textual productions of the opinion article, carried out in an academic context. Classes took place in person and the production stages took place in digital format, with explanations and posts on Google Drive and shared via email and/or whatsapp, in addition to the institutional Integrated System for Academic Activities Management (SIGAA). We opted for the sequence of classes to carry out the textual opinion production process, with moments of reading, writing, (re)writing and (re)reading, which are called discursive instances for the enunciative analysis based on theoretical categories mobilized, such as: notion of subject and (inter)subjectivity in language, notion of form and meaning, notion of space and time (sui-referential) and notion of discourse. At the end of this process, we verified that it is possible to perceive the evolution of the academic enunciation through writing, demonstrating that an enunciative intervention can contribute to a more productive (re)writing. |
