Eficiência e qualidade de aplicações de fungicidas, por vias terrestre e aérea, no controle de doenças foliares e no rendimento de grãos de soja e milho

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2009
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Deise Isabel da lattes
Orientador(a): Boller, Walter lattes
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade de Passo Fundo
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia
Departamento: Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária – FAMV
País: BR
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://10.0.217.128:8080/jspui/handle/tede/406
Resumo: New equipment and technologies for aerial and ground sprays have been developed, many at the regional level, because weather conditions, inherent in each region, are related to the success or failure of an application of agricultural chemicals. In order to add on a multidisciplinary, some basic knowledge about the control of diseases of plants and technologies for aerial and ground sprays were accomplished in the Tapejara county, state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, (season 2005/06 soybean) and in the Coxilha county, state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, (season 2006/07 maize). In soybean, were evaluated the viability of the chemical control of the powdery mildew (Erysiphe diffusa) and the Asian rust (Phakopsora pachirhizi) through the aerial and ground fungicidal sprays at different day times and ambient conditions. The fungicide Priori-Xtra® (azoxystrobin + ciproconazole) was sprayed at R3 growth stage and 21 days later (R5.3). The experiment conducted in maize crop intended to evaluate the viability of the polysora rust (Puccinia polyssora) and the common helminthosporiose (Exserohilum turcicum) chemical control through various forms of aerial and ground sprays of fungicides. The fungicide Opera® (piraclostrobin + epoxiconazole) was sprayed when the maize showed eight leaves with height between 0.7 m and 0.8 m (feasible height limit for entrance with ground sprayer) and in the tasseling stage and in both moments. Aerial applications performed better than ground sprays. The use of fungicide was feasible and the economic gains depended on the form of application that was adopted. Ground applications, in both crops, cause significant damages by tire tracks, especially in the maize crop