Alunos com baixo desempenho escolar no Ensino Fundamental I: análise das condições de enfrentamento de adversidades

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2014
Autor(a) principal: Moreira-Malagolli, Gabriela Maffei [UNESP]
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/123366
http://www.athena.biblioteca.unesp.br/exlibris/bd/cathedra/27-04-2015/000823875.pdf
Resumo: Backed by bio-ecological perspective of human development, the research investigates the conditions of coping adversity of children with poor school performance. A longitudinal study with 4 teachers, 23 parents and 20 children was conducted in a period of two years following students who were in the 2nd year and later went to the 3rd year. The data collection instruments used with students were: TDE, Reading Survey, writing and mathematical logical reasoning, EOCA, CATS scale and the Individual Performance Sheet. With parents used the RAF and EEA. With all participants we used semi-structured interviews with. Students were selected who identified themselves as inferior in the SPT and since then, has organized three different groups: G1 (medium), G2 (lower middle) and G3 (lower). It was noted that the students of the G1, were children engaged in reading when they are not in school. Demonstrated alphabetical match in the second year and showed no problems with mathematics in the third year. Like school and have referred to as a space to play. In the classroom, said they talk a lot, but they have learned. Data from teachers confirmed this fact. Mothers showed no school complaints. Among the students of G2, most have the habit of reading when they are not in school. Despite all reach the alphabetic hypothesis in the second year, the problems with mathematics persisted until the third year. School, made references to the room and extra class activities, friends and games. Said they could learn, but one child. As for the parents, all were satisfied with the school, but three reported that already had wanted to enroll their children in private schools. Just as children of the G1, the G2 showed no difficulties in social competence. G3 children have few books at home. These are children who do not have the habit of reading when they are not in school. Two children reached the alphabetic hypothesis in the second year, three in the third year and ...