Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2014 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Sanabria de Aleluia, José Roberto [UNESP] |
Orientador(a): |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/110474
|
Resumo: |
The presented research in this paper aims to understand the discursive constitution of teaching philosophy in Brazil. By mapping and analysis of discontinuities and discursive regularities that preceded the founding of the Faculty of Philosophy, Sciences and Letters of the University of São Paulo, it tries to show what were the conditions that allowed the emergence of a discursive order of teaching philosophy and how such speech produced the image of the illustrated elite philosopher at the University of São Paulo in 1936. Therefore, we investigated the constitution of the subjectivity ways existing between the late nineteenth century to the early twentieth century through the archeology-genealogical methodological procedure. To reach these goals we underline the main concepts developed by Michel Foucault in the archeological and genealogical journey to understand the discursive order that sustained enunciation University of Sao Paulo. We observe that such order provided the existence conditions for the illustrated elite philosopher teaching that governed by the history of philosophy method would be able to philosophize in his meditations or by critics today, aiming to find the general principles governing the multiplicity of things. In this same order, we understand that the professor of philosophy would assume two roles, the first most distinguished, for it was characterized as Philosophy itself, as practiced criticism of the present through the history of philosophy .But, also considered a teacher - commentator, to the extent that argued for their students on the key concepts and historical characteristic of classical authors .The results obtained indicated that the desire to form elite illustrated philosophers inspired by the doctrine of wisdom that would be the reason lawmakers did not occur, but it served the interests of the ruling classes in the silencing and exclusion, preventing the emergence of other forms of philosophical life. |