Avaliação cinesiográfica e da satisfação de usuários de próteses totais após a utilização de dois adesivos

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2014
Autor(a) principal: Rodriguez, Larissa Santana [UNESP]
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/145515
http://www.athena.biblioteca.unesp.br/exlibris/bd/cathedra/23-09-2016/000871149.pdf
Resumo: The objective ofthis studywas toevaluate the effect of using two denture adhesive (DA) (Ultra Corega cream- A1 and Ultra Corega powder - A2) on the pattern of jaw movements, maxillary complete denture (CD) movement, and satisfaction of CD with DA. Methods: Participants (n = 40) received new CD and after the adjustment period, they were submitted an initial assessment, and divided randomly into two groups according to the protocols (P): P1- use A1 followed by use A2; P2 - use A2 followed by use A1. The data were obtained through a questionnaire and kinesiography. Results: There was a similar intrusion of control, A1 and A2 (0.85 mm), but a larger displacement (0.17 mm) from the maxillary CD after use A2 (p <0.05). There was no significant difference (p> 0.05) for the three-dimensional movement of the jaw after using A1 / A2. The comfort and retention of mandibular PT were influenced by AS (p <0.05). A1 and A2 show no significant differences in relation to their aspects (p <0.05), however, when was evaluated the satisfaction between them, A1 showed significant differences from A2 (p <0.05). Conclusion: Although the use of A1 or A2 did not influence the three-dimensional movement of the jaw, a greater displacement of the maxillary CD was observed during chewing with A2. Both DA had significant influence on patient satisfaction, and A1 showed the best results.