Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2013 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Cassemiro, Mariana da Silva [UNESP] |
Orientador(a): |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/110534
|
Resumo: |
This study aims at investigating the development of oral production in the English language classroom from first-year undergraduate Letters students as well as discussing the implications of not only their oral production but also of their professor’s teaching practice as far as teacher education is concerned. This work consists of a qualitative research with ethnographic basis and the data collection techniques used to do it were audiotaped classes, field notes, diaries, questionnaires answered by the students and an interview conducted with the professor. In order to develop this study we utilized the sociocultural theory (VYGOTSKY, 1996, 2000, 2010; LANTOLF & THORNE, 2006; JOHNSON, 2009; LANTOLF, 2011) and language acquisition theories elaborated by Krashen (1987), Swain (1993, 2000) and Block (2003). In addition, we considered works concerning oral language (BYGATE, 1987; LUOMA, 2004) and the ones about oral language teaching such as Consolo (2000, 2006), Consolo, Martins & Anchieta (2009) and Consolo & Teixeira da Silva (2010), as well as some relevant research in the field of language teacher education (JOHNSON, 2009; KUMARAVADIVELU, 2006, 2012; VIEIRA-ABRAHÃO, 2007, 2010, 2012). The results suggested that the oral production was built not only when the professor provided students with input to be used by them in their production but also when she mediated their learning in the English language classroom. In addition, the analysis showed that the professor gave attention to language teacher education specially related to the development of oral language. Although based on a more traditional perspective to teacher education, the findings suggested that the professor’s teaching practice seemed to contribute to the first-year undergraduate Letters students’ education as future language teachers |