Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2015 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Santos, Maria Fernanda dos [UNESP] |
Orientador(a): |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/139379
|
Resumo: |
There is a growing demand for improvements in medical education in both technical and humanistic domains. The internship is a crucial period for the acquisition and development of skills by medical students. Efforts to understand how medical schools assess this important period of training may point out directions for improvement in medical education with implications for Public Health. Hence we aimed to analyze the instruments used by medical schools to evaluate the internship rotations from the point of view of their students. Our main hypothesis was that many instruments do not incorporate questions directed at the assessment of ethical conflicts occurring during that period. We conducted a cross-sectional study based on documentation analysis of the instruments used by Brazilian medical schools for evaluation of the internship rotations by their own students. We randomly selected 121 Brazilian medical schools. We excluded medical schools that still did not have students enrolled in any internship rotation as of the first semester of 2014. Two independent researchers examined the assessment instruments obtained and extracted standardized information for each instrument. Any disagreements between the reviewers will be solved through the assessment of a third researcher. Of the 121 institutions contacted, 46 agreed to participate in the survey. Among these, 23 stated that they some formal instrument for evaluation of the internship rotations by their students. Only 12 medical schools had instruments that addressed the ethical dimension in some way. In most cases the ethical issues examined were related to the attitude of preceptors. None of the instruments addressed the ethical issues related to the healthcare. Only two instruments questioned the students about negative ethical experiences and conflicts during the rotations and only one sought to find positive ethical experiences. We argue that assessment instruments based on the ... |