Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2016 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Aguiar, Dimas Campos de [UNESP] |
Orientador(a): |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/138936
|
Resumo: |
In recent years it has been possible to note a considerable growth in the number of companies and people who use the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis, or FMEA, in process analysis. However, in its execution there are uncertainty situations, making possible to promote different types of information, raising questions whether the assessments are really complete. This study aims to define a conceptual model for Process FMEA application, reducing variations in interpretations, scoring and decisions criteria. From a theoretical framework, a structure for FMEA construction is identified, where those development activities are classified as qualitative, quantitative and corrective, according to the type of analysis of the evaluations. A specific study is developed for each category of evaluation. A case study in FMEA application associated with the concepts of process approach is done regarding qualitative analysis; a literature review on scoring FMEA criteria is done regarding quantitative analysis; and a survey on the rules used for recommending actions in Process FMEA is done regarding corrective analysis. As output, a proposal focused on the elimination of irregularities in the implementation of FMEA is done, filling a gap between theory and practice. |