Contribuições das reflexões do Círculo de Bakhtin para o estudo e prática da tradução: uma análise do datiloscrito de Clarice Lispector da peça The member of the wedding

• Ano de defesa: 2015
• Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Eneida Gomes Nalini de [UNESP]
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
• Palavras-chave em Português: Bakhtin, M. M. (Mikhail Mikhailovich) 1895-1975; Lispector, Clarice 1920-1977; Dialogismo (Análise literária); Traduções; Translations
• Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/127868

Besides being a chronicler, a novelist and a playwright, Clarice Lispector also worked as a translator and as part of this last job she left the unfinished datiloscrito of the play The member of the wedding (1961). The play was originally written by Carson McCullers. Without there being any publication, of this work, it is part of Casa de Rui Barbosa Foundation and it presents handwritten interventions - questions, possible changings, deletions and comments, which explains her tradutological process. The aim of this paper is to analyze the translation according to Bakhtin Circle's reflections, establishing dialogues between the original text, the translation itself and what we call retranslation, in which there are handwritten interventions. The analysis of translation process of these two versions led us to accomplish two other translations from the original text - a literal translation and a literary translation - in order to have two references of analytical comparison. This investigation is performed through dialogism and ideological interrelation, aesthetic and contextual between the writers Clarice Lispector and Carson McCullers and their productions. In this sense, we have the support of linguistc assumptions, starting in Saussure, Benveniste and Bakhtin's contributions. In addition to Bakhtin's contributions and the translation studies, the chronicle Traduzir procurando não trair published in Revista Jóia, in 1968 is important in the analysis because Clarice Lispector reflects upon the practice of translation, registering personal opinions about the act of translating. As a result, we verify the translator's presence as a thinking subject, showing the style and authorship in the translation, solving linguistcis variation presents in the original text as well as resolving problems of the discursive genre. There is room of intermediation between the original text and its translation that allows changes...