Efeito de diferentes estratégias para adesão de um adesivo universal no modo autocondicionante: ensaio clínico, randomizado, duplo cego
Ano de defesa: | 2018 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
Cascavel |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Odontologia
|
Departamento: |
Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Palavras-chave em Inglês: | |
Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
Link de acesso: | http://tede.unioeste.br/handle/tede/4501 |
Resumo: | This double-blind randomized clinical trial evaluates strategies for improving the bonding of universal adhesive to enamel in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL). Methods: 260 restorations were randomly placed in 50 patients according to the following groups: SE – Self-etch; SEE - Selective etching; SE2X - Self-etch doble time; SE1+ - Self-etch additional layer. The restorations were evaluated after one week (baseline) 6 months, using the FDI and USPHS criteria. Statistical analyses were performed using Friedman and McNemar test (=0.05). Results: Thiteen restorations were lost at 6 months (5 for SE, 1 for SEE, 4 for SE2X and 3 for SE1+) (p > 0.05 between groups). Post-operative sensitivity wasn’t observed in any of the recall periods. fifty-six restorations were considered to have minor discrepancies in marginal adaptation at the 6-month recall using the FDI criteria (16 for SE, 08 for SEE, 16 for SE2X and 16 for SE1+; p > 0.05 between groups). Eleven restorations were considered to have minor discrepancies in marginal discoloration at the 6-month recall (04for SE, 01 for SEE, 03 for SE2X and 03 for SE1+; p > 0.05 between groups). Conclusion: The different strategies application of universal adhesive showed similar clinical behavior of composite restorations placed in NCCLs over 6 months. |