A compreensão do subdesenvolvimento Furtadiano a partir do debate da estagnação dos anos 1960

• Ano de defesa: 2024
• Autor(a) principal: Avila, Matheus Fernandes Franklin
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Uberlândia; Brasil; Programa de Pós-graduação em Economia
• Palavras-chave em Português: Celso Furtad; Estagnação; Concentração de renda; Dependência; Política; Celso Furtado; Stagnation; Income concentration; Dependecy; Policy; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ECONOMIA::TEORIA ECONOMICA::HISTORIA DO PENSAMENTO ECONOMICO; Economia; ODS::ODS 1. Erradicação da pobreza - Acabar com a pobreza em todas as suas formas, em todos os lugares.; ODS::ODS 10. Redução das desigualdades - Reduzir as desigualdades dentro dos países e entre eles.; ODS::ODS 16. Paz, justiça e instituições eficazes - Promover sociedades pacíficas e inclusivas par ao desenvolvimento sustentável, proporcionar o acesso à justiça para todos e construir instituições eficazes, responsáveis e inclusivas em todos os níveis.
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/41361; http://doi.org/10.14393/ufu.di.2024.78

The History of Brazilian Economic Thought reunite a set of controversies and debates about development. Among the controversies, the stagnation debate had great notoriety in the 1970s, as it discussed underdevelopment and a new pattern of accumulation in Brazil, during a period of dictatorial regime by military governments. The bases for the stagnation debate within Brazilian economic thought was based on the contributions of Celso Furtado (1968), more specifically in his interpretation of underdevelopment through a model of economic growth whose key element is the income concentration. Tavares and Serra (1971), in the article Para Além da Estagnação, contest Furtado's vision, arguing that Brazil could grow, overcome stagnation, and achieve a certain degree of economic dynamism, despite preserving the structures of inequality and concentration income, in a historical context marked by accelerated growth boosted by PAEG financial reforms. The objective of this work is to understand underdevelopment based on stagnation debate regarding the concentration and distribution of income, theoretical issues and the protagonism of decisions and political actions on the economic order. Besides that, it is intended to support a position that Celso Furtado's arguments have greater theoretical robustness in understanding the structures of brazilian underdevelopment, considering the distinctions between theoretical levels of abstraction, corroborating the idea that the central object study of the author is underdevelopment and not just stagnation.