Reorientação teórica ou ruptura tardia? Um estudo teórico-bibliográfico sobre a hipótese da descontinuidade da Teoria Crítica de Max Horkheimer

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2022
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, Bruno Pereira
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
Brasil
Programa de Pós-graduação em Filosofia
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/38026
http://doi.org/10.14393/ufu.di.2023.6010
Resumo: The foundations of Max Horkheimer's critical theory flourish in his youthful aphorisms written between 1926-1931 and mainly in the articles published in Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung (Journal for Social Research). Nevertheless, his later formulations, developed especially in Dialectics of Enlightenment and The Eclipse of Reason, occupy a fundamental place in the body of his work, as well as in the history of twentieth century philosophy. The present dissertation aims at outlining possible continuities or future ruptures in critical theory after 1940, when Horkheimer established a closer intellectual relationship with Theodor W. Adorno. The fundamental problem that seeks to be clarified in the subsequent pages is whether there would really be an unequivocal continuity in Horkheimer's work. Could one assume that what prevailed in his philosophy was theoretical reorientation or rupture? This dissertation argues that there is a theoretical reorientation from 1930 to 1940, however, this reorientation rises to the condition of rupture in the following decades, in his notes and late notes. The research hypothesis is that there would be a late rupture in Horkheimer's philosophy when considering the passage from Interdisciplinary Materialism to the critique of Reason and, belatedly, to negative theology and the longing for the Whole Other.