A luta pelo direito à cidadania na cidade de Uberlândia: o movimento das pessoas com deficiência entre a legalidade e a legitimidade

• Ano de defesa: 2014
• Autor(a) principal: Almeida, Késia Pontes de
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Uberlândia; BR; Programa de Pós-graduação em História; Ciências Humanas; UFU
• Palavras-chave em Português: Luta pela autonomia; Hegemonia; Representatividade; História social; Uberlândia (MG) - História; Deficientes físicos - Uberlândia (MG); Associação dos Paraplégicos de Uberlândia; The Struggle for autonomy; Hegemony; Representation; CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::HISTORIA
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/16475; https://doi.org/10.14393/ufu.di.2014.87

This work aims to think the struggle of disabled people for autonomy as Gramsci molds in order to understand how people with visual impairments are situated politically through their private apparatus of hegemony. In chapter one, tract development of coalitions of people with disabilities and their role in national and state constituents as well as their participation in discussions of the drafting of municipal organic law. For this, I make a few remarks about civil society, its constitution and its role as producer of hegemony and counter-hegemony. Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, do considerations about how the struggle for autonomy walked in Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, and operated as the quest for citizenship in capitalist lines. Later, I think the formation of organic intellectuals, as well as the formation of the movement and how it is still connected to subordination. In chapter two, I make an explanation of the role that the individual plays in the social group to which it belongs, according to the Gramscian reflections. Then step to ponder as APARU developed throughout the 1990s, primarily to see how this institution led to the formation of its intellectuals, as they developed their militancy beyond the institutional framework and how they achieved prominence in the fight by accessibility. In the third chapter, I discourse on the philosophy of praxis is an important factor when thinking private apparatus of hegemony of persons with disabilities and then show how association of visually impaired people trod different paths of associations of persons with disabilities his dominion internationalist groups, Rotary Club and Lions Club as well as try to understand the division of this segment in an attempt to leave the guardianship and charity groups from Uberlândia linked to the medical field, and finally, because their representation is still small. Thinking about it, I divide the history of this association in three moments that intertwine: charity and philanthropy; rehabilitation through sport and inclusion in the labor market.