Anarquismos e formas de subjetivação nas escritas da história

• Ano de defesa: 2014
• Autor(a) principal: Monteiro, Fabrício Pinto
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Uberlândia; BR; Programa de Pós-graduação em História; Ciências Humanas; UFU
• Palavras-chave em Português: Anarquismo; Escrita da História; Subjetivação política; Memória e esquecimento; História social; Anarquismo e anarquistas; Historiografia; Anarchism; Writing History; Politics subjectivity; Memory and oblivion; CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::HISTORIA
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/16315; https://doi.org/10.14393/ufu.te.2014.8

This thesis has as main goal the discussion about the relationships built by author/anarchist militants among its written history, policy proposals for the current society and its forms of subjectivity. In the first part of the thesis, the central focus of the debate involves active authors in Brazil and we contemporaries, among them Edgar Rodrigues and - somehow linked to the so-called \" poststructuralist anarchism\" - Edson Passetti and Nildo Avelino. For discussion of this problem, some issues and debates have gained prominence throughout the research, such as the construction of memories and oblivion in anarchist writings of history, the notion of contemporary and ownership via elaborations of memory, the thought of non-anarchist authors, as Max Stirner, Friedrich Nietzsche and Michel Foucault, for the construction of policies proposed by anarchist militants. The second part of the thesis consists of three essays that aim to contribute to the reflection on ways of libertarian social history. Three dialogues were chosen as problematizing motto: Mikhail Bakunin and other revolutionaries (or reformers ) of the League of Peace and Freedom and the International Workers Association, between the 1860s and 1870s; the sometimes acid debate between Ludwig Feuerbach, Max Stirner and Karl Marx, in the first half of the nineteenth century and, in a longer chronological retreat, the debate between Parmenides, Gorgias and Aristotle.