Um psicólogo em processos: imagens justas e justamente imagens no Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de São Paulo

• Ano de defesa: 2020
• Autor(a) principal: Ferreira, Leandro Augusto [UNIFESP]
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
• Palavras-chave em Português: Psychology; Justice; Judicial Psychological Expertise; Children And Adolescents; Families; Psicologia; Justiça; Perícia Psicológica Judicial; Crianças E Adolescentes; Famílias
• Link de acesso: https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/trabalhoConclusao/viewTrabalhoConclusao.jsf?popup=true&id_trabalho=10182382; https://hdl.handle.net/11600/64799

This investigation proposes a dragnet approach to the problems within the processes used by a psychologist who works in the São Paulo judiciary system. The research unfolds with the production of credible narratives with sensitive writings based on cases taken as truth. These narratives bring fair images, that is, narrative images adequate to a moral system, and precisely images, with unprecedented singularities, both in tension with their ambiguities, emerging from the intersection of several power-knowledges. Each chapter expresses the "case documentation-format", with traces of a judicial process and that at the same time does not imply only the "case" in the strict sense. These processes, in a broad sense, are one by one open in problematic fields, in which narratives and the lives at stake are the guiding thread of research. They are the infamous ones, meaning: those without fame, who suddenly come under the light of power and fall into their plots. They had their lives scanned by agents of power-knowledge, producing several encounters. Each chapter-process brings its narrative in crossing areas between a psychologist (which at the same time are several), traced from the legal area and the lives in tension. The themes and the problems emerge and are dealt with one by one, as the cases raise them. In this manner, the productions of truth, morals and its fair game (too appropriate), affects and affections are questioned during the production of knowledge and writing, the judicialization of life, the implications with ressentiment, the tragic culture niches nowadays, distinct blame, brands that drag, many justices that slide and overlap. Distinct and different families emerge to compose these images: a girl who needs to make a choice, a couple who wants to become a father and father, two sisters who live different lives with the same grandmother, a girl who seeks a remedy for the separation of mother and father, two children who fall into dreams, a boy in search of a father. This research deals with lives on a case-by-case basis, living in the intersection with the judiciary, with psychological power-knowledge and, more precisely, with an investigation that tries to intertwine traces of the records with what is obscene, which cannot be on the scene and is not in the file.