Estudo comparativo da prevalência de perda auditiva induzida por níveis de pressão sonora elevados em profissionais e não-profissionais do som

• Ano de defesa: 2008
• Autor(a) principal: El Dib, Regina Paolucci [UNIFESP]
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
• Palavras-chave em Português: Estudos transversais; Perda auditiva provocada por ruído; Perda auditiva; Cross-sectional studies; Hearing loss caused by noise; Hearing loss
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/9502

Background: Music is ever present in our daily lives, establishing a link between humans and the arts through the senses and pleasure. Sound technicians are the link between musicians and audiences or consumers. Recently, general concern has arisen regarding occurrences of hearing loss induced by noise from excessively amplified sound-producing activities within leisure and professional environments. Sound technicians’ activities expose them to the risk of hearing loss, and consequently put at risk their quality of life, the quality of the musical product and consumers’ hearing. The aim here was to measure the prevalence of hearing loss induced by elevated sound pressure levels among sound technicians in Brazil and compare this with a control group without occupational noise exposure. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study comparing 177 participants in two groups: 82 sound technicians and 95 controls. A questionnaire on music listening habits and associated complaints was applied, and data were gathered regarding the professionals’ numbers of working hours per day and both groups’ hearing complaint and presence of tinnitus. The participants’ ear canals were visually inspected using an otoscope. Hearing assessments were performed (tonal and speech audiometry) using a portable digital AD 229 E audiometer funded by FAPESP. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the sound technicians and controls regarding age and gender. Thus, the study sample was homogenous and would be unlikely to lead to bias in the results. A statistically significant difference in hearing loss was observed between the groups: 50% among the professionals and 10.5% among the controls. The difference could be addressed to high sound levels. Conclusion: The sound technicians presented a higher prevalence of high frequency hearing loss consistent with noise exposure than did the general population, although the possibility of residual confounding due to unmeasured factors such as socioeconomic status cannot be ruled out.