Quem cuida, quem ensina, quem aprende: campo e interações entre atenção primária e escola na produção da queixa escolar

• Ano de defesa: 2016
• Autor(a) principal: Lobo, Fernanda Senna [UNIFESP]
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
• Palavras-chave em Português: Primary Health Care; Unified Health System; School Health; Family Health; Public Policies; Atenção Primária à Saúde; Sistema Único de Saúde; Saúde Escolar; Saúde da Família; Políticas Públicas; Saúde Coletiva
• Link de acesso: https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/trabalhoConclusao/viewTrabalhoConclusao.jsf?popup=true&id_trabalho=3682697; http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/41861

Assuming the scholar health under the historical perspective and trying to comprehend the possibilities which provide the production of scholar complaint, its routing and acceptance by the medical services may give clues to comprehend the interactions between School and Health, which gives way to the scholar failure. Considering the relations between a public school on the outskirts of São Paulo and the Primary Care service of Sistema Único de Saúde,this research sought to understand the possible ramifications of this interaction under a critical point of view.Methodology: Case study of qualitative approach. Field research and interviewswere made with professionals involved in the production of scholar complaint linked to the school, to the UnidadeBásica de Saúde, and to the Diretoria Regional de Educação. Results and discussion: There are different web arrangements being developed between the Primary Attention services and schools that are crossed by the school complaint and the public politics of health care and the different web configurations of health care affect the scholar complaint. Some interactions, which do not depend on public programs, can be its enabler. Considering the history and culture of institutions, the abilities and the availability of the subjects involved, and the search for the routine on its professionals actions is very important. Looking at the territory may seem an important progress,but one must be alert to easy answers that justify school complaint by the situations of vulnerability. Final thoughts: Respecting the space and knowledge of others, searching for a common ground, recognizing failures (and avoiding them), and showing yourself available seem to be key elements to set significant intersectorial actions. Family Health presents a powerful instrument to act on this perspective and to reach the relations being producedall the time on the field of interactions of the scholar complaint.