Bósnia-Herzegovina pós-Dayton

• Ano de defesa: 2025
• Autor(a) principal: Silva, Cristiane Barboza Lopes da
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria; Brasil; Ciência Política; UFSM; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Relações Internacionais; Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas
• Palavras-chave em Português: Dayton; Statebuilding; Instituições; Institutions; CNPQ::OUTROS::RELACOES INTERNACIONAIS
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/34562

Bosnia and Herzegovina, a remnant of the former Yugoslavia, experienced an intense war between 1992 and 1995. The conflict was marked by political, ethnic and religious disputes that changed the country’s social structures. The Dayton Agreement (1995) ended the war, establishing two entities within the state – the Republika Srpska and the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina – and creating the Office of the High Representative (OHR) to oversee their implementation. However, despite ensuring peace, which has lasted 30 years, the Dayton Agreement imposed structural challenges on the country’s development. Research indicates that, between 1995 and 2025, international intervention and the statebuilding process faced difficulties due to the fragility of the institutions as conceived by the Agreement. The established governmental structure has perpetuated ethnic divisions, hindered constitutional reforms, and allowed Republika Srpska to adopt positions that undermine the strengthening of Bosnia, maintaining the interests of its entities above those of the State of Bosnia and Herzegovina.