Capacidade de mascaramento de diferentes combinações de resina composta após envelhecimento em água

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2017
Autor(a) principal: Perez, Bibiana Gabardo
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Odontologia
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Odontológicas
Centro de Ciências da Saúde
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Cor
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/21763
Resumo: ADVISOR: Letícia Brandão Durand The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the layering technique of three resin composite restorative systems (IPS Empress Direct, Charisma Diamond and Filtek Z350XT) on masking a discolored background (C4) after a period of 1 year of aging in deionized water. Ninety 1.5 mm-thick specimens were made from three different restorative systems. The specimens were divided into groups and sub-groups according to the restorative system used and resin composite shade combi-nation used in the layering technique (enamel, body and dentin). The color meas-urements of the specimens were performed on the C4 substrate at two times: after a 24-hour immersion period in deionized water (T0) and after 1 year of aging (T1), through a reflection spectrophotometer (SP60, EX-Rite). The masking ability was evaluated from the calculation of ΔE, performed between the inherent background and the C4 background, at baseline and after water aging Comparative analyses were performed between the color measurements on the C4 background at the two times from CIELAB and CIEDE2000 formulae. ANOVA and Turkey's post hoc test (a=0.05) were performed to analyze the ΔEab and ΔE00 mean values. Only the sub-groups of the restorative system IPS Empress Direct 0.5mm enamel + 1.0mm dentin and 1.5mm dentin did not differ statistically between times, both for CIELAB and for CIEDE2000. None of the subgroups analyzed presented clinically acceptable values after aging.