Avaliação em educação especial: tecnologia de governamento no atendimento educacional especializado

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2013
Autor(a) principal: Rios, Grasiela Maria Silva
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
BR
Educação
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/7069
Resumo: This study is part of the Research Line Special Education Program Graduate Education. Its guiding question to understand what effects the discourse on assessment are brought into service by Care Specialized Education - AEE, in the conduct of conduct of teachers AEE in Florianópolis - SC. This undertaking investigative inserts into a post-structuralism approach, in which I use the lens Foucault, specifically addressing the concept of governmentality tool. The corpus of empirical research is composed of two groups of materials: documents related to legislation and evaluation reports of students served and followed the AEE, prepared by the teachers care. After the analysis of the laws, I could understand that the evaluation is produced as a possibility for identification, investigation and diagnostic categorization of the subjects of the deviation and as a mechanism of control and regulation of the conduct of the student by the teacher AEE, making students and ways of teaching performance. Then to understand how the assessment is operating driving conduct faculty, through the analysis of 194 evaluation reports produced by the teachers of the AEE in Florianopolis. Recurrences discursive found, indicate three analytical categories: "Need to diagnose / schedule and meet: Strategy driven to lead as a teacher of the AEE", "Need to standardize: teaching practices in front of the student AEE" and "Need convincing: The search for the family as a partner for the state government and learner control deviation in inclusive schools ". It was possible to show that the search for the diagnosis turns on the need for standardization as a strategy to regulate the discipline and control of risk on these subjects deviating from the norm. Finally, we have the embodiment of a relationship 'more government under government' for everyone to be and remain in school, in an order consistent with the neoliberal rationality and security policies related to education, brokered with the discourses of human rights in order to convince everyone in mobilizing for inclusion to happen.