Aspersão de diferentes tipos de água eletrolisada em carne suína e avaliação da qualidade microbiológica e oxidativa
Ano de defesa: | 2016 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
BR Ciência e Tecnologia dos Alimentos UFSM Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência e Tecnologia dos Alimentos |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Link de acesso: | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/5795 |
Resumo: | Spray application of electrolysed water (EW) different types was studied with objective of verify effects in bacterial growth, lipid and protein oxidation, also color. Temperature (18 and 30°C) and applied volume of water (100 and 200 mL of EW to 250 g of pork loin), as well pressure (30 and 45 psi) was tested variables in six experiments. From the beginning the experiments was based in water and energy saving, grounded in resources saving. Acid electrolysed water (AEW), slightly acid electrolised water (SAEW) and basic electrolysed water (BEW) was applied individual, and had less effect than alternate (BEW +AEW and BEW+SAEW) applications regarding mesophylls, lactic acid bacterias, Enterobacteriaceaes, with little effect on psychrotrophics. Lactic acid bacterias growth was favored in vacuum environment and interfered on meat pH, while EW treatments had no interferences in meat pH along six experiments. Bacterial effects of different EW types and combinations presented decrease tendencies until 15th storage day. Along storage BEW + AEW and BEW + SAEW at 45 psi was more significant in reduce bacterias than individual treatments. Still, EW temperature had no influence in results of realized analysis. Lipid oxidation with AEW and SAEW was higher than BEW that had values according to control. When AEW and SAEW was applied in alternate form, the application of BEW applied first provided fats and protein protection from AEW and SAEW attack, and this fact don t occurred when EW was individually applied. Color had no significant changes for individual EW applications, but in alternate applications, 45 psi promote little changes in color. Correlations with carbonyl and thiol indicated protecin oxidation evolution in pig meat long storage period in all experiments. Redo x potential demonstrated be a good analysis that can be contributed to comprehension of oxidative aspect of meat. Hexanal was more detected in BEW + AEW than BEW +SAEW in storage time. Different types of EW spraying application can be a good alternative with use potential and decrease quantity of utilized water, being alternate form of application more advantageous than individual application about quality attributes of pig meat, like bacterias and physic-chemical. |