Levando o direito à intimidade à sério no contexto da sociedade em rede
Ano de defesa: | 2017 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil Direito UFSM Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Link de acesso: | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/18497 |
Resumo: | The right to intimacy, foreseen in article 5 of the Federal Constitution, acquires new delineations in the context of the network society, characterized by the use of information and communication technologies, especially the Internet. From the investigation of its historicity, this right is exposed considering the temporality and complexity of the 21st Century, which brings with it new and sophisticated mechanisms for the invasion and violation of the individual's privacy, which becomes vulnerable in this scenario. Therefore, the legal and decision-making grounds for the pre-comprehension of the right to intimacy are discussed based on the theoretical contributions of Gadamer and Dworkin, also reflecting on the role of the judge in the hermeneutical constitutional jurisdiction and about the possibility of obtaining right answers in cases of right to privacy’ violations. For that, the approach will be phenomenological-hermeneutical, allied to the methods of historical, comparative and case study procedures. The intention is to ascertain which legal elements should be previously understood in the construction of judicial decisions involving the fundamental right to intimacy in the context of the network society, starting from the need for procedural jurisdiction to provide right answers to the Constitution in the Democratic State. At the end, a critical reflection is provided on decisions taken by the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice and the Federal Supreme Court, in order to verify the state of the art of decisions which involve intimacy and the Internet, and especially its adequacy of the answers to the Constitution, basis and observation of the coherence and integrity of the law. |