Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2011 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Santos, Henilton Faria dos
 |
Orientador(a): |
Melo, Ricardo Oliveira Lacerda de |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Sergipe
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Pós-Graduação em Economia
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/4550
|
Resumo: |
This study aims to evaluate the Plano Plurianual 2008-2011 (Multiyear Plan 2008- 2011 PPA 2008-2011) of the State Government of Sergipe as a tool for government planning, based on the programs of the Strategic Guideline Desenvolvimento Territorial Participativo e Sustentável (Participatory and Sustainable Territorial Development). Despite the fact that the focus of this research is the current Sergipe s PPA, we sought to analyze all Multiyear Plans implemented in Brazil and Sergipe since the Constitution of 1988 in order to grasp how was the evolution of the methodology of development and evaluation of these documents over the years. We also studied the Federal Government evaluation methodology for these programs, as well as that of various units of the federation. Throughout this analysis it was found that the proper way to establish a relationship between the contents of a plan and its achieved goals is employing physical and financial monitoring reports of the actions and impact evaluation reports of programs, based on well constructed and measurable indicators. However this is not the reality of the state of Sergipe. There are few data available about the physical execution and there is no assessment of the impact of the programs, which, in our view, is the best way to gauge the effectiveness of a public policy. Thus, we sought to evaluate the current PPA programs, having as premises the feasibility of this venture and its impact on society. However, adjustments were made in the methodology of program evaluation studied in order to allow a more concise analysis, but with scientific validity. Thus, we evaluated all programs of the Strategic Guideline Participatory and Sustainable Territorial Development regarding their design and financial execution of its actions for the period 2008-2010. The main results point to an extreme fragility in the definition of the programs indicators, which virtually precludes an assessment of their impacts, and a low rate of program s financial and actions implementation. In addition, we found that many of the actions planned were not even started, indicating a lack of prioritization of what needs to be placed in the PPA, given the financial and budgetary constraints of the State. |