Ativismo e Estado judicial : um olhar a partir do pensameno de Montesquieu

• Ano de defesa: 2014
• Autor(a) principal: Santana, Eunices Bezerra Santos e
• Orientador(a): Santana, Eunices Bezerra Santos e
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Pós-Graduação em Direito
• Palavras-chave em Português: Montesquieu; Ativismo judicial; Soberania popular; Poder judiciário; Poder judiciário e questões políticas; Direito constitucional; Direito e Filosofia; Democracia; Estado
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Constitutional law; Democracy; Judicial power; Law; Political questions and judicial power; State, The; Popular sovereignty
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
• Link de acesso: https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/4356

Nowadays, one of the recurring problems is the increasingly proactive role of the judiciary organ, mainly after the 1988 Constitution, which is introducing a true legalization of daily life, as a sort of graduation compared to judicialism in terms of judicial action. Such phenomenon is now nominated as judicial activism. It is in this context that revisits the thought of Montesquieu, especially the system of checks and balances that coined by philosopher and starting this dissertation from the premise that the people are the true holder of the last word. However, recognizing that the most expensive matters to society issues end up in the hands of the judiciary organ, who is forbidden to establish the non liquet , this body ends up being taken to an activism that needs to be revised and the society must show their own strength, otherwise Brazil , which has suffered from stateship , it will have risked its freedom, democracy, fundamental values that Montesquieu identifies in the republican form of government, establishing, finally, the true empire of laws.