A "Revista Agricola, órgão da Sociedade Sergipana de Agricultura" e a estratégia da produção e organização do campo em Sergipe, 1905-1908 : "por em commum as 'luzes' e experiências"

• Ano de defesa: 2012
• Autor(a) principal: Santos, Fabrícia de Oliveira
• Orientador(a): Conceição, Alexandrina Luz
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Pós-Graduação em Geografia
• Palavras-chave em Português: Geografia; Periódicos científicos; Análise do discurso; Geografia agrícola; Revista Agrícola; Capitalismo tipográfico; Polifonia do discurso; Produção do campo sergipano
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Agricultural Magazine; Typographic capitalism; Polyphony of discourse; Production of Sergipe countryside
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CIENCIAS HUMANAS::GEOGRAFIA
• Link de acesso: http://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/7431

This thesis demonstrates a reading of an article in the Revista Agrícola (SSA), a publication of the Sergipe Agricultural Society viewed from the standpoint of Mikhail Bakhtin’s language philosophy. The magazine is seen in terms of the period of tumultuous political transition from empire to republic, the changes in labor organization, and their effects on the restructuring of the cities and countryside. The magazine is considered as being a mechanism which aided in organizing the discourse concerning the Sergipe countryside, beginning in 1860 with the Sergipe Imperial Institute of Agriculture, consolidated with its publication during the four years from 1905 to 1908. This thesis analyses the reason for the existence of this publication as part of the typographic capitalism, its simultaneity of ideas, the production of a language concerning farming, commerce and industry, according to current ideologies on a global scale. The discourse did not exist in a cultural vacuum, exhibit evidence of polyphony, various voices, in agreement and discord, in such a way as not to be a homogenous discourse, but promoted a united discourse on how and in which ways the countryside should be reorganized in order to face the new demands of capitalism. This form of production was diluted by linguistic signs and symbols within a historical and geographical discourse, with descriptions, criticisms and praise. It was not the soil itself that offered the greatest difficulties; it was the question of farming itself, the question of activities in the countryside. The countryside itself was to a point illusory: fertile, yet inefficiently used, in which the rural workers were camouflaged beneath ideological symbols, such as being lazy, and work-shy. Those who responsible the discourse, despite their best attempts to be independent, presented and defended their ideals. The discourse since the magazine was more fragmented, disguised and more connected to the needs of international markets. Some of the words were repeated, but with new meanings; old agrarian issues dressed up as new issues.