Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2015 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Daltro, Katia Figueirôa
 |
Orientador(a): |
Silva, Veleida Anahí da
 |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Sergipe
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Pós-Graduação em Ensino de Ciências e Matemática
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/5169
|
Resumo: |
This dissertation analyzes the proposed curriculum of Biology teaching in two experimental Aracaju UP Centers, State College Atheneu Sergipense and Experimental Minister Marco Maciel Center. The methodological approach used in carrying out this research presented here was characterized by qualitative approach. The qualitative look, knowledge is seen in motion. Thus, for data collection were employed: interviews (semi-structured), documents (Curriculum Reference, annual planning, curricular and pedagogical political project organization), observations and questionnaires. We use to analyze theoretical concepts of scholars curriculum: Sacristan (1998), Goodson (1995), Moreira (1991, 2001, 2007), Macedo (2006), Michael Apple (2000); full education and the teaching of Biology use: Ghiraldelli (1992), Santos (2010), Gonçalves (2005), Lamb (2001), Texeira (1994), Bittencourt (2003), Krasilchick (2008). It was evident that there was a real change, which can be seen today, and that construction of the curriculum for Biology discipline had a democratic participation in two Experimental Centers of Aracaju. Finally, we can say that the change that occurred in the construction of Experimental Center of Aracaju was coming from an innovative curriculum, even if initially characterized in real curriculum and subsequently developed by a formal curriculum. |