Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2012 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Matos, Andrea Maria dos Santos
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Alves, Eva Maria Siqueira
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Sergipe
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Pós-Graduação em Educação
|
| Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/4748
|
Resumo: |
This study aimed to analyze the concepts of elementary school teachers, the 5th and 9th grades in two schools in the city of Aracaju - who participated in the three editions of Proof Brazil (2005, 2007 and 2009), have both forms of education (higher and lower) and has the highest and lowest note of the Index Basic Education Development (IDEB) for the initial years on the Evaluation of Educational Achievement and teaching of Mathematics. To do so, it is necessary to understand the history of the Evaluation System (SAEB) Proof to the institutionalization of Brazil (both ratings and officers of the MEC), the organization and structure of Brazil Exam in math, their descriptors, skills and skills, some questions from the math test models made available on the National Institute of Educational Studies Anísio Teixeira (INEP) for the two series evaluated and its focus on problem solving; check the approaches between the Reference Matrix Assessment of Mathematics (MRAM), the Syllabus of the Municipal School of Aracaju (CPRMEA) and the contents worked in math classes, thus it was necessary to the presentation of the Education Network this county, proof Brazil in the selected schools and the results of this evaluation and IDEB in mathematics; examine the conceptions of teachers in relation to Brazil Exam and assessment in mathematics through questionnaires answered by 17 teachers and four interviews were selected from this sample, and this selection was due to teachers' conceptions of proof on Brazil and troubleshooting. In this perspective, the analysis of documents was based on a theoretical framework, guided by expert authors in their respective areas of expertise, such as assessment of learning through studies Luckesi (2010), Hoffmann (2009) and Furlan (2007) evaluate the academic performance in the understanding of Souza (2010), the second assessment in mathematics Mendes (2009); curriculum in understanding Ortigão (2005), Silva (2001) and Goodson (2007, 2008), and problem solving under look Onuchic (s / d). Therefore, we present the question that guided this research: the conceptions of teachers of elementary school, 4th grade / 5th grade and 8th grade / year 9 on the Brazil Test of Mathematics and its approaches to the teaching of mathematics? With the results, we conclude that the schools surveyed do not prepare for the implementation of evidence Brazil, their routine is not changed in light of this evaluation, the teachers were not included in this process by the Department of Education nor the school units. For teachers rating is assigned to a value judgment without analyzing the results and turn them into meaningful learning, but this is a practice common to the school community as well as a production from the ranks. And finally the results of the trial Brazil are not known, nor understood, nor appropriate for managers, teachers and school staff and there is a policy of treating pedagogical analysis of these results by the responsible agencies. |
