Implementação de uma correção de dispersão empírica aos métodos semiempíricos RM1 (Recife Model 1) e PM6 (Parametric method 6)

• Ano de defesa: 2017
• Autor(a) principal: Silva, Danylo Alves da
• Orientador(a): Costa Júnior, Nivan Bezerra da
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Pós-Graduação em Química
• Palavras-chave em Português: Química; Densidade; Ciclodextrinas; Parametrização; Correção de dispersão; Métodos semiempíricos; Teoria do funcional da densidade
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Parametrization; Dispersion correction; Semiempirical methods; Theory of density functional; Cyclodextrins
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::QUIMICA
• Link de acesso: https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/6653

In the present study, the implementation and parameterization of the dispersion correction functions, denominated DM1 and DM2, was carried out to the quantum semiempirical methods RM1 and PM6, in the program Mopac2007. The aim of this study is to improve the description of weak interactions by the methods above mentioned with the addition of na energy correction. The DM1 methodology contains 7 parameters while the DM2 model presents 13 parameters for the correction function. Unlike previous work, the correction was used to adjust not only the energy, but also the geometric parameters. The parameterization was performed using a training set composed by 10 structures from S22 database and 24 structures from S66 database. The results show that RM1-DM1 and RM1- DM2 improved the total response function when compared to RM1, the RM1- DM1 is better at describing the geometries of the complexes on the other hand, the RM1-DM2 is more efficient in reproducing the dispersion energy. The PM6- DM1 and PM6-DM2 methods, for the test set, had a smaller response function than PM7 and PM6 and their extensions with correction of dispersion forces. The best response function for PM6-DM1 and PM6-DM2 is related to the description of the geometries of the complexes, with the dispersion energy being slightly higher than that obtained by the PM6-DH2 method. The semiempirical methods discussed here, together with the theory of density functional, with the most popular B3LYP functional, were used to calculate the geometry of cyclodextrin/guest complexes. The results obtained, with semiempirical methods, showed that AM1, PM3, PM6-DM1 and PM6-DM2 presented the lowest values of RMSD and variability for a set of 43 cyclodextrins. The DFT methodology was used to calculate the geometry of a set of 9 cyclodextrins/guest complexes, the result was compared to semiempirical methods. The best DFT result was obtained with the 6-31G base, it is similar to obtained by the RM1 method. For this set, the methods AM1, PM6-DM1 and PM6-DM2 presented the best results in the description of the geometries.