Integração e relações bilaterais assimétricas : Brasil-Guyana e Brasil-Suriname

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2017
Autor(a) principal: Lima, Suely Aparecida de
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Roraima
Brasil
PRPPG - Pró-reitoria de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação
PPGSOF - Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociedade e Fronteiras
UFRR
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufrr.br:8080/jspui/handle/prefix/375
Resumo: Guyana and Suriname are small countries facing up to difficulties of insertion in South America. For this reason, a profile for their asymmetric bilateral relations with Brazil was drawn through the articulation of binomial integration-asymmetry. Brantly Womack’s theory of asymmetry was approached as a theoretical-methodological resource for this research. With regard internal asymmetries common to the three countries concerned, there is a conformation between ethnic-racial and regional asymmetries marked by lack of infrastructure. In relation to asymmetries between Brazil and Guyana and Brazil and Suriname, the South American panorama indicates that Brazil’s advantages over Guyana and Suriname are relative, not absolute. Their differences in capacity can be transformed and negotiated. Nonetheless, transformation is conditioned to broader structures and conjunctures. On the other hand, negotiation is available to asymmetric pairs with a propensity for cooperation, which is the case of these bilateral relations in question. In this context, while Guyana and Suriname use their relative and natural advantages, Brazil provides a wider framework to address themes that permeate such bilateral relations in the official sphere. Examples of this are the incorporation of technical cooperation by the Brazilian Cooperation Agency (Agência Brasileira de Cooperação - ABC); bilateral trade by the Program of Competitive Import Substitution (Programa de Substituição Competitiva de Importações – PSCI) and; physical integration by the Iniciative for the Integration of the Regional Infrastructure of South America (Iniciativa para a Integração da Infraestrutura Regional Sul-Americana – IIRSA)/South American Council of Infrastructure and Planning (Conselho Sul-Americano de Infraestrutura e Planejamento – COSIPLAN)/Union of South American Nations (União das Nações Sul-Americanas – UNASUL). As a result, this Brazilian strategy turns essentially political issues into technical concerns.