A autoria em monografias de conclusão de curso de letras: uma abordagem enunciativa
Ano de defesa: | 2015 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Brasil Linguística e ensino Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística UFPB |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Link de acesso: | https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/tede/7720 |
Resumo: | This work investigates the construction of authorship in final course monographs of Letras major based on reported speech schemes. To do this, we follow enunciative postulates, more precisely, from The Bakhtin Circle and dialoguing with studies under Dialogic Theory/Analysis of Speech, among them, Faraco (2005); Amorim (2006); Brait (2006); Francelino (2007; 2011); Cunha (2008); Fiorin (2008); Grillo (2010); Sobral (2012; 2013); Aran (2014), and also Discourse Analysis studies, more precisely, Orlandi (2000; 2001); Tfouni (2006); Possenti (2001; 2009; 2013). Methodologically, this research is characterized as documentary and bibliographic with a descriptive and interpretative character. The corpus consists of five monographs produced by Lettras students. Specifically, the research aims to: (i) identify and describe linguistic, discursive and enunciative schemes of another's speech transmission employed in the monographic genre; (ii) to discuss issues arising from speech schemes that shape the authorship in the construction of meanings on the monographic genre. According to our analysis, another's speech incorporation schemes establish the authorship from the following aspects: (1) the author manages consonant and dissonant voices that are involved in their enunciation; (2) the author creates borders establishing an alternation between the reported speech and the speech that is reporting; (3) the author infiltrates his/her expressive-evaluative tone in another‟s speech; (4) the author places the discourse of the other as a parameter/basis for evaluate a particular event. The schemes to seize and transmission anothers's speech are ways in which language indicates the impressions of another's speech and marks the subjectivity of the speaker. Thus, monograph genre is like a stage in which, voices, style, compositional structure and objectal-semantic content is built from the meeting between speeches. That is, in building the theme, the speaker-author mobilizes anothers‟s speeches which he/she replies, agrees, polemicizes, etc... |