Atividade antifúngica do cinamaldeído biossintético sobre Candida spp. de interesse clínico para cavidade bucal: estudo in silico e in vitro

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2019
Autor(a) principal: Alves, Danielle da Nóbrega
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso embargado
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Brasil
Odontologia
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Odontologia
UFPB
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/20048
Resumo: Background: One of the biggest challenges in the dental clinic is fungal infections resulting from the use of dental prostheses. This is due to the limited number of antifungal agents available on the market, as well as to increased microorganism resistance. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the antifungal action of cinnamaldehyde against Candida species, its possible mechanisms of action in vitro, cytotoxicity against keratinocytes (HaCat), molecular interactions with enzymes related to formation of the fungal cell wall and membrane. Results: In molecular coupling simulations, the cinnamaldehyde-enzyme binding energy values showed that 4MAI (squalene epoxidase) presented the most stable interaction (-70.4951Kcal.mol-1), suggesting probable activity involving ergosterol biosynthesis. Six reference strains of Candida, (being sensitive and resistant to prescription antifungal agents), were used to determine Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs), Minimum Fungicide Concentrations (MFCs), possible mechanisms of action, and molecular docking. A descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was performed considering α (error type 1) = 5%. The MIC and MFC values ranged from 18.91μM to 37.83μM. The MIC values did not change in the presence of at the concentration of 0.8 M sorbitol, unlike what occurred in the presence of ergosterol, these values increased by 8 times. The action of Cinnamaldehyde likely includes binding to enzymes involved in formation of the cytoplasmic membrane of Candida genus fungi. Regarding the cytotoxicity tests, up to the concentration of 15μg / mL of cinnamaldehyde, 100% cell viability was observed, therefore, in fungicidal concentrations (5μg / mL), showed no cytotoxicity. Conclusions: Cinnamaldehyde showed fungicidal activity for the strains tested, with an ergosterol action mechanism, besides being non-cytotoxic with keratinocytes.