O discurso e prática pedagógica do professor alfabetizador em aulas de leitura.
Ano de defesa: | 2013 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal da Paraíba
BR Linguística Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística UFPB |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Link de acesso: | https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/tede/6399 |
Resumo: | Although reading has often been present in discussions and research in academia, it still is a relevant object under investigation. The importance of these investigations increases as worries grow about the large number of students who cannot make effective use of reading, or who remain illiterate at the end of the first stage of primary education, as it is revealed by official rates, like those reported by IDEB. This research, adding to this problem, aims to contribute to a reflection on the alphabetization and literacy, and as specific objectives: a) analyze what teachers say about reading and what they can put into practice in class; b) analyze teaching resources/materials used to promote reading acquisition; c) analyze the reading methods adopted by two teachers and its impact on the teaching and learning process of reading in literacy process. Therefore, we rely on studies such as Bakhtin (1986/2002/2010), Vygotsky (1991), Certeau (1994), Geraldi (1996/2003/2011), Sousa (2002/2009), Soares (2001/2004/2012), Kleiman (2000/2001/2002/2006/2009), among others. It was assumed that children who reach the 5th grade without getting a good performance both in reading and in writing is the result of a process of literacy in which they are not actually being inserted in a universe where reading and writing are significant and that teachers remain with a practice that is not consistent with their discourse. The corpus of this research is composed from structured questionnaires answered by two literacy teachers from municipal public schools from Taperoá PB and from audio recording of a sequence of classes of reading teaching in their respective classes. In lessons recordings, we analyze the practice of those teachers, their conception of language and reading, as well as methods and resources those teachers actually use in class, in contrast with what they have revealed at the questionnaire. It was verified that when those teachers have mentioned reading they revealed a reading conception that includes necessarily the role of the subject-reader, assuming the reading work as comprehension ability in order to develop literate citizens. However, at several moments that reading conception does not find resonance in their practice. It was noticed that the practice of one of the teachers, which it is called "PA" here, although at various times has been significant, based on a conception of language that really includes the subject reader, it was predominant the conception of reading as decoding written text only. This reading conception was less recurrent in the practice of another teacher, called PB here. It general, it was concluded that both teachers can put into practice some activities they say they carry on, at other times, they fail to develop a teaching practice how they claim. It was also concluded that the reading activities carried out at the observed classes were, in general, satisfactory; therefore, if they are not entirety, most of the time for reading, there is a concern to lead the students to understanding, to being subject knowledge builder. |