O (res) significado do trabalho nos manuscritos econômico-filosóficos de 1844, de Karl Marx
Ano de defesa: | 2019 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Brasil Filosofia Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia UFPB |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Link de acesso: | https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/19053 |
Resumo: | This dissertation is a study about the meaning of "work" in Karl Marx's (1818-1883) economic-philosophical manuscripts of 1844, under the meaning of the (res) meaning of that work. It also aims to examine the consequences imposed on the subject of work, from such statements. In the same way, it analyzes the relation between man and the external and inner nature and the alienated / strange work, trying to contribute with the free reflection in the recovery of the positive meaning of the work, an aspect that is so identity to the contemporary man. For Marx in the relationship alienated labor, each man considers the other according to the measure and the relationship in which he finds himself as a worker, however, the work is conceived under the effects of new social, political and technological changes. The study explores the theme of work in this work, in the concrete utopian perspective, as studies carried out in the context of the commemoration of the 200 years of Marx. Thus, the exhibition is divided into 03 (three) parts. The first deals with the meaning of alienated work, based on Karl Marx's studies from the French Revolution, and on the Political Economy of the classic English economists or science of wealth, represented by Adam Smith, David Ricardo and Say. In the second part, we have the critical foundations of alienated work, whose representation falls on Hegel, for being the pioneer to mention the term alienation, followed by Feuerbach, and finally updated by Marx. The third part comprises the resignificant contribution of alienated work, in the utopian and concrete perspective, based on reflections allusive to Karl Marx's 200 years, in which one seeks to overcome the meaning of alienation, given the technological advent and the emancipating philosophical legacy. Therefore, it is concluded that it is plausible to resume the positive meaning of labor to human nature, contradicting the results of capitalist practices. |