Padrões de movimentação ocular durante a elaboração de cenários familiares e não familiares e o seu resgate subjetivo e quantitativo
Ano de defesa: | 2018 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Brasil Psicologia Programa de Pós-Graduação em Neurociência Cognitiva e Comportamento UFPB |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Link de acesso: | https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/14209 |
Resumo: | The present study sought to investigate behavior in the elaboration of familiar and unfamiliar scenarios for a future time, with elements of future episodic thinking (what-wherewhen) and the performance at the recall, in order to assess if familiarity issues and novelty are related to the ability to achieve more or less vivacity and more or less details. Thirty-six volunteers participated, among 13 males and 24 females, but 16 participants had their data discarded because they had not reached 80 % of gazing rate acquisition. The data of 11 female and 9 male subjects were analyzed. The mean age of the male volunteers was 19 years old for the male population and 21years old for the female population. One experimental task and one previous training were performed to familiarize the participants with the equipment resources with the task procedures. The training contained distinct clues (keywords) from the experiment itself. The sequence order of the clues was the same for all participants, since the purpose of the statistical data analysis would be inter-subject. First, they were asked to create scenarios within a week from the day of the experiment and these scenarios should answer the following questions: the first sequence of clues were 6 (six) words representing family sites and the second sequence was of words representing unfamiliar / new places .After each word / place presented, volunteers received the following information: Imagine in these scenarios: (1- what you will be doing, 2-where you will be, 3-what day this event will be). While the volunteers watched a blank screen for 60 seconds, an eye tracker Tobii TX300 made the binocular capture of eye movements. After the elaboration of each scenario (familiar and unfamiliar / new) participants answered three questions, the same questions for all scenarios and, on a five-level scale of the Likert type, chose the impression they had of the intensity of vivacity of scenes or the impression of the amount of detail that they were able to recall. The main results were: there was a difference in the performance of the recalled information about future episodes in the construction of familiar and unfamiliar scenarios: in the familiar scenarios, the vivacity and quantity of details was greater than in unfamiliar or new scenarios. However, the ocular behavior during the construction of familiar and new scenarios did not present differences, or presented small differences as the ocular movement followed a similar pattern during the construction of the two types of scenarios, but data showed that there were more fixations within the two upper quadrants (1 and 2 ) than the lower ones ( 3 and 4 ). Another result obtained was the recording of amounts of fixations that had a greater number in quadrants 1 and 2. And, differently from the previous result, which had shown no difference between familiar and non-familiar fixations duration during the scenes constructions. Regarding to the fixation count number, the hypothesis that there would be registered a higher number of fixations during the construction of familiar scenarios than during the non-familiar scenarios, was confirmed. |