Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2020 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Nora, Lissandro Dorneles Dalla |
| Orientador(a): |
Fagan, Solange Binotto |
| Banca de defesa: |
Alves, Vanessa Terezinha,
Dorneles, Lucio Strazzabosco,
Egito, Eryvaldo Sócrates Tabosa do,
Zonatto, Patrinês Aparecida França |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Franciscana
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Nanociências
|
| Departamento: |
Biociências e Nanomateriais
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://www.tede.universidadefranciscana.edu.br:8080/handle/UFN-BDTD/914
|
Resumo: |
In an important context for innovation development, the present study aims to develop, in an innovative way, a tool to support the decision-making process that enhances the actions of everyone involved in the process. Thus, nanotechnology relies on applications that vary from the creation of new materials for health to sectors such as electronics, communication, among others. The introduction of new technologies impacts the way in which the industrial-economic system develops its activities, affecting, mainly, market competitiveness. In this context, the search for innovative tools becomes essential in order to meet the market’s expectations. In this way, this paper aims to investigate and propose a modeling for measuring the competitive performance of nanomaterials and their socioeconomic effects with focus on cosmetics, in the aims of starting the creation of a platform to support decision-making in the context of nanomaterials. We opted for the multicriteria system of decision support and the model development of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), with its structure being validated by 23 specialists. The AHP development allowed us to observe the relative importance of the “investment” criteria, with 85.7% importance, and the “toxicity” criteria, with 75% importance. Regarding the sub-criteria, the attention was associated to income generation, having the “per capita consumption”, with relative weight of 68.2%, and the “toxicity”, with 66.7%. As regards evaluation alternatives, “genotoxicity” had 46.9% relevance, and the “dedication time”, 40.3%. Therefore, it is possible to infer that the evaluation of competitive performance of nanomaterials applied to cosmetics is based on an economic matrix, mainly related to investment return and influenced by the environmental dimension, and on its characteristics of toxicity evaluation. It is also highlighted the decision-maker’s attention to social matters, as well as the capacity of income generation under the perspective of the sector’s per capita consumption. Thus, it is expected that the innovation factors introduced by this study’s development allow for the strengthening and development of research and generation of products resulting from a conscious decision-making process. |
