Diferenças nas características clínicas e complementares de apêndices normais e inflamados com diagnóstico de apendicite.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2020
Autor(a) principal: Pedro Luiz do Nascimento Júnior
Outros Autores: Andy Petroianu, Carlos Teixeira Brandt
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Brasil
MEDICINA - FACULDADE DE MEDICINA
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Aplicadas à Cirurgia e à Oftalmologia
UFMG
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Dor
Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/36096
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3640986430203279
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2994208795860340
http://lattes.cnpq.br/4540675807816003
Resumo: INTRODUCTION: Despite the great advances in diagnostic methods, the incidence of removal of a morphologically normal appendix in patients with clinical and complementary signs of acute appendicitis continues to exceed 20%. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical, laboratory, and ultrasound findings of inflammatory and noninflammatory appendiceal conditions diagnosed as acute appendicitis. METHOD: The medical records of a total of 208 patients with clinical, laboratory, and ultrasound findings indicative of acute appendicitis were studied. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 comprising 94 patients whose histological results suggest a normal appendix and group 2 comprising 114 patients with histopathological tests confirming acute appendicitis. The analyzed variables were age at the time of surgery, sex, nausea and vomiting, inappetence, fever, pain migrating to the right iliac fossa, pain on palpation of the right iliac fossa, Blumberg’s sign, blood counts, ultrasound findings, and Alvarado score. RESULTS: The inflamed appendices were associated with inappetence, pain on palpation of the right iliac fossa, appendiceal diameter > 6 mm, and Alvarado score > 6 (p < 0.001). In contrast, fever was more frequently found in noninflammatory appendiceal conditions (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Inappetence, pain on palpation of the right iliac fossa, appendiceal diameter > 6 mm, and Alvarado score > 6 indicate an inflammatory appendiceal disease, whereas fever is more often present in noninflammatory appendiceal diseases.