Pânico: um estudo de interações multiparticipantes em programa radiofônico

• Ano de defesa: 2007
• Autor(a) principal: Shirlei Maria Freitas de Mello
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; UFMG
• Palavras-chave em Português: Polílogos; Interações multiparticipantes; Estrutura de participação; Dinâmicas interativas; Trabalho de face; Humor, sátira, etc; Pânico (Programa de rádio); Interação social; Gêneros textuais; Cortesia; Entrevistas em rádio; Estratégias discursivas; Análise do discurso; Identidade social; Estratégias interacionais; Análise da conversação; Rádio Programas; Sociolingüística
• Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/VCSA-77TGDB

From an Interactional Sociolinguistic standpoint, this study aims to describe and to analyze the organization of four broadcast multi-participant interactions and touch upon the interactive dynamics that collaborate for the building of social identities during the talk shows under investigation. Based on Goffmans concept of face (1967), on Brown and Levinsons model of politeness (1987) and on Kerbrat-Orecchionis reflections on polylogues (2004) this research attempts to contextualize the participantsinteractional roles, evidencing the program ethos. It also presents an analysis of the macrostructure of the interactions, their turn-taking and address systems as well as the participation framework. In addition, it deals with the interactive dynamics carried out in an attempt to contribute to the understanding of their rolein the establishment/maintenance of the participants identities in the speech events investigated. The data analysis could reveal a hierarchical organizational pattern in the interactions, under study, which signal the power relations that constitute and regulate the negotiations, carried out by the participants, and which are used to save their faces and sustaintheir public image. Among other aspects, this research could also demonstrate that the analysis of the macrostructure of the interaction, of the participation framework and of the facework carried out are complementary and, co-operatively, help build the ethos of each ofthe interactions.