Comparação entre os requisitos de iluminação artificial dos sistemas de rotulagem ambiental aplicados no Brasil para edifícios comerciais, de serviços e públicos: estudo de caso
Ano de defesa: | 2013 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
UFMG |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Link de acesso: | http://hdl.handle.net/1843/BUOS-9NSJ7A |
Resumo: | This work aims to analyze the barriers and potential in classifying the energy efficiency level of artificial lighting systems in samples of Commercial, Service and Public Buildings labeled, or in the labeling process, based on the requirements demanded by the RTQ-C from PBE Edifica and by environmental labeling systems LEED and AQUA. Thus, this study aims to classify the requirements for artificial lighting systems in the environmental labeling processes, evaluate how the standards are demanding in face of the market reality and verify the impact that each activity represents in the building certification. To enable the study, were chosen 18 buildings, grouped into 8 case studies, covering offices, universities and museums, located in the states of Minas Gerais, São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, previously labeled or in the labeling process. The methodology applied began with a survey of requirements related to artificial lighting that are mandatory or that enable points achievement in the labeling systems. Later, the requirements "lighting power density", "automatic lighting shutoff" and "space control" were applied in the case studies considering each building activity. The Building Area Method and the Spaceby- Space Method, suggested by PBE Edifica Label and by the LEED System, were the main tools for the activities characterization in potential or critical. Analyzing common activities to all case studies, the results indicate that the activities seen as potential for level improvement on the building energy efficiency are offices and meeting rooms. The activities that need special attention, depending on the choice of the labeling system to be implemented, are lobby and waiting room. The critical activities and focus of concern, independent of the choice of labeling system, are toilets and circulation. Beyond that, was detected that the criterion "space control" is easily adopted by enterprises, while "automatic lighting shutoff", for having a larger initial cost, many times does not present itself as an investor priority. |