Nós pesquisadores: uma experimentação educativa no contexto de pesquisasclínicas em saúde
Ano de defesa: | 2016 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
UFMG |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Link de acesso: | http://hdl.handle.net/1843/ANDO-AHHHX7 |
Resumo: | This paper is a proposal of creation, development and analysis of an educational experiment in the clinical trial context and made reference to the epistemological debate that crosses the field of education and studies review on educational practices used to promote understanding in clinical research. Aims to understand the interference between the experimentation We researchers, the production of knowledge on research and agency of new modes of subjectivity with clinical trial participants. This is a qualitative study, developed with theoretical andmethodological inspiration from intervention research and mapping, presenting as a reference the theoretical philosophy of difference and schizoanalysis. The trial was conducted with 52 participants, residents of the hookworm endemic area, who was participating in a clinical trial whose aim was to develop a vaccine against the disease. The We researchers experimentation included three different educational stages: (1) The catalog, research and life; (2) Dramatizing sensations, feelings and perceptions about research; (3) The vaccine, its stepsand procedures in developing of health care technology. Through the catalog and its potential to affect and connect the participants and researchers interfered in the production of meanings on research from the life, work and shared knowledge. Thereat, it was possible to produce an aesthetic experimentation which would point to ways to transform and invent the own life. The scenes produced with the dramatization demonstrate an assembly and disassembly process made by the participants to make sense about desires and affectations from therelationship with daily life, knowledge and research.In the context of problematization was mounting thoughts the escaped from repetition of scientific knowledge, through active modes that connect other forces andknowledge to break and go beyond the side effects, procedures, and steps of a test vaccine. The researcher and participant relationship indicated that there were movements that were established beyond passivity built in educational processes in which the figure of the researcher takes place of the knowledge and the truth, to reproduce hegemonic logic. During the educational process were observed interference in knowledge production and the subjectivity production broken with the traditional and dialogical logic, open to the multiplicity of meanings field, signs and perceptions brokered by the connections between research and everyday life. |