Testando a hipótese de que a abordagem profunda gera melhor desempenho acadêmico

• Ano de defesa: 2021
• Autor(a) principal: Marina Nogueira dos Santos Rodrigues
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; Brasil; ICB - INSTITUTO DE CIÊNCIAS BIOLOGICAS; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Neurociências; UFMG
• Palavras-chave em Português: Abordagens de aprendizagem; Estudo experimental; Ensino; Aprendizagem; Portfólio; Neurociências
• Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/35389

Students’ Approaches to Learning (SAL) theory assumes that the deep approach generates better academic performance when compared to the surface approach. This study tests this hypothesis, using a randomized experimental design of pre- and post-test case-control. Students in a discipline of a biology course were randomly allocated to the experimental and control groups. The experimental group carried out a pedagogical activity which aimed to mobilize the deep approach, while the control group performed a mobilizing activity with a surface approach. Student performance was analyzed by valid and reliable educational tests designed for this purpose, using a statistical Rasch Models. Results indicated that both groups showed substantial gains in two of the three learning tasks. The experimental group did not show a higher gain than the control group. From the present study, it can be seen that, in order to actually test the SAL principle, it is necessary to monitor in detail the student's cognitive process. In addition, it can be concluded that it is important that the research area on SAL increases its efforts in quantitative studies of learning processes.