Associação e discriminação: limites jurídicos para os critérios de admissão, exclusão e categorização de associados

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2018
Autor(a) principal: Daniel de Pádua Andrade
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Brasil
DIREITO - FACULDADE DE DIREITO
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito
UFMG
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/41464
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5513-4650
Resumo: Reconciling associative autonomy with the prohibition of discrimination is not an easy task. The right to freedom of association allows associations to define their internal rules according to their own interests, but the right to equality prohibits the establishment of bylaw’s clauses considered discriminatory. Faced with this apparent dilemma, the work aims to identify substantial guidelines that can subsidize judicial control of the criteria for admission, exclusion and categorization of associates in a manner consistent with the national legal system. Through a theoretical research of juridical-dogmatic nature and comprehensive comparative typology, the work seeks to detail the normative context of the problem of discrimination in the associative sphere, to question the models currently used for its confrontation, and to propose ways that lead to safer results. It is hypothesized that the verification of the lawfulness of the differentiated treatments promoted by the associations can be improved by considering the theories of discrimination developed in the field of moral philosophy. These theories provide detailed insights into the elements responsible for characterizing a distinction as discriminatory and can, therefore, be used to make legal discussions more transparent, coherent and assertive. The research carried out confirms this assumption through the illustrative exposition and the hypothetical application of the notion of discrimination as demeaning formulated by Deborah Hellman.